Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) makes up nearly half of all heart failure cases and remains a difficult condition to treat due to limited therapeutic options. Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators—namely Riociguat, Vericiguat, and Praliciguat—have shown potential in improving heart muscle relaxation and vascular function. However, their comparative effectiveness and safety are still uncertain.
Methods We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) that included eight randomized controlled trials encompassing 7,330 HFpEF patients, with an average age of 69.5 years. The outcomes evaluated included survival rates, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NT-proBNP levels, hospital readmissions, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and adverse events. Treatment outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) along with 95% credible intervals (CrI).
Results Riociguat indicated a potentially favourable survival benefit (OR 3.69, 95% CrI: 0.53–29.2) and a reduced risk of hospital readmission (OR 0.40, 0.11–1.30), though these findings were not definitive. Praliciguat had neutral effects on survival (OR 1.05, 0.017–61.0). Vericiguat did not improve survival (OR 0.42, 0.12–1.16) but did offer a modest improvement in NYHA functional class (log RR 0.27, –0.12 to 0.67). Changes in LVEF were unclear: Riociguat (MD 3.00, –1.15 to 7.13), Vericiguat (MD 1.59, –2.03 to 5.17), and Praliciguat (MD –0.19, – 7.34 to 6.84). Riociguat was associated with a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (MD –7.41, –21.2 to 4.41), whereas Vericiguat (0.65, –9.54 to 10.8) and Praliciguat (5.28, –12.6 to 23.0) had neutral effects. Adverse events such as headache (log RR 0.21, –0.35 to 0.78), low blood pressure (0.42, –0.21 to 1.05), and neurological symptoms (–0.04, –0.87 to 0.79) were not significantly increased.
Conclusion Among the agents studied, Riociguat showed the most promise in terms of survival and reducing hospital readmissions in HFpEF patients. Vericiguat offered modest improvements in patient functional status, while Praliciguat had minimal clinical impact. The findings suggest that more extensive, long-term clinical trials are needed to better establish the efficacy and safety of these therapies.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocolshttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251137091
Funding Statementnone
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availabilitysupplement file
Comments (0)