Non-linear Relationships between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Mortality by Vaccination Status within Age Groups

Abstract

Background: Observational studies on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) are prone to biases such as healthy vaccinee effect and misclassification, potentially distorting mortality patterns by vaccination status. The proportionality hypothesis posits that COVID-19 mortality is proportional to all-cause mortality within subgroups, but selection bias and frailty may introduce non-linearity. Objective: To investigate non-linear relationships between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 mortality by vaccination status using UK data, modeling with a power function to correct for biases. Methods: Monthly age-standardized mortality rates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) database (January 2021-May 2023) were analyzed for five vaccination statuses and six age groups. Relative risks (RR) were calculated, and a power function (RRcov ~ (RRnoncov)^a) was used to test non-linearity. Optimal a-values were validated via visual analysis of VE curves, focusing on stability and logical patterns. Results: In older age groups (<70 years), the relationship was non-linear (a = 1.5-2), with VE stabilizing at 60-90% after correction. No significant improvement from additional vaccination doses was observed. Younger groups showed near-linearity (a = 1-1.5). Concentration effects explained higher mortality in groups not receiving additional doses. Conclusions: The non-linear model corrects for biases, suggesting initial vaccination suffices for protection and multiple boosters may be unnecessary. Frailty likely drives this non-linearity in older groups. However, visual analysis limits robustness; future validation with individual-level data and statistical tests is needed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used only openly available human data that were originally located at:Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2023). All data relating to 'Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023'. Published August 25, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2022). All data relating to 'Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 May 2022'. Published July 6, 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif