Background Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) enhances paediatric cancer diagnosis and management compared with standard molecular assays. However, its clinical utility could be further improved by reducing the National Health Service England (NHSE) turnaround times (TAT).
Methods We evaluated an ‘Ultra-Fast WGS’ (UF-WGS) workflow in a tertiary UK paediatric haematology-oncology unit. Children with suspected or confirmed cancer were recruited over two years (2023-2025), and their tumour, bone marrow and/or blood samples were sequenced on the UF-WGS workflow. All patients underwent concurrent NHSE Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) WGS, serving as the validation benchmark.
Results Of a total of 54 patients were recruited at diagnosis or relapse. UF-WGS reduced TAT to a mean of 3 days from sample collection, compared with 37 days for GMS-WGS. UF-WGS recalled 95% (143/151) of all clinically actionable somatic and germline variants not found standard NHS GMS-WGS testing. UF-WGS detected an additional 19 clinically actionable variants not found by GMS-WGS. Differences between the two workflows were attributable to tumour heterogeneity in some cases, and low variant allele frequency of those variants identified discrepantly.
Additionally, in 18/35 (51%) prospective cases, UF-WGS enabled demonstrable improvements in care. Clinicians independently judged that 9/19 (47%) of the retrospective cases would have clinically benefited from real-time UF-WGS. UF-WGS provided additional flowcell proximity data, which illustrated the potential to positively impact clinical care.
Conclusions This study indicates the feasibility and utility of UF-WGS and shows added benefits for the clinical management of paediatric cancers, with wider implications beyond this patient group.
Trial Registration 22/WA/0336
Competing Interest StatementMM, SC, PG, ZK, JB, TN, IA, IV, MB, LF, JW, MR, DB and SH are or were employees of Illumina at the time of the study, a public company that develops and markets systems for genetic analysis.
Clinical Trial22/WA/0336
Clinical ProtocolsFunding StatementThis work was supported by the Rosetrees Trust (AV, DHR), Addenbrookes Charitable Trust (AV), Isaac Newton Trust (DHR) and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Full ethical approval granted by the Health Research Authority and Health Care Research Wales (REC reference 22/WA/0336).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript, and supplementary tables. Any additional data may be available upon reasonable request to the authors
Comments (0)