Introduction Stem cell transplant (SCT) is a potential cure for haematological malignancies whose outcomes are predicted to be poor on chemotherapy alone and cases difficult to treat using standard of care treatment. There is growing evidence to show that not all patients who would benefit from SCT, receive it due to inequities in the treatment pathway. The role of socioeconomic deprivation on inequities in the SCT setting is unclear due to conflicting findings. We aim to synthesis the UK evidence base in this area to guide further research and policy to improve survival for underserved patients.
Method and analysis Primary electronic searches will be performed in bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Proquest Databases, Central & CDSR, Stem Cell Evidence and Web of Science and Google Scholar for grey literature. Eligibility criteria will include observational studies of UK patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies, treated with SCT, where outcomes are reported according to socioeconomic deprivation. Two independent reviewers will screen each study and assess the quality of all included studies be using the Newcastle-Ottawa grading system. Outcomes of interest include delay in diagnosis/referral, treatments/interventions received, referral to transplant, presence of co-morbidities affecting transplant eligibility, access to transplant, transplant utilisation rates, waiting time to transplant and survival rates. Inequities in SCT due to socioeconomic deprivation will be narratively summarised. Meta-analysis will be conducted dependent on data availability. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (2024: CRD42024620592).
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this study as it is a secondary analysis of published data. The findings will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication, shared at conference presentations, and disseminated to both clinical and patient groups including National (Black, Asian, Mixed Race, and Minority Ethnic) BAME Transplant Alliance (NBTA) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This review will provide the first comprehensive and systematic summary of inequities due to socioeconomic deprivation in the stem cell transplant setting in the UK, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines
This review will focus on data collected from studies performed in a UK population only. The findings can be applied to a UK population but application to other countries will be limited.
Patients and the public participated in the development of the review and will support interpretation of findings and dissemination to the wider public.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study was funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
FootnotesEmail: zbd338student.bham.ac.uk; s.j.cusworthbham.ac.uk; carolyn.doreendcls.ox.ac.uk; james.griffinnhsbt.nhs.uk; n.j.adderleybham.ac.uk; j.s.chandan.1bham.ac.uk
↵* Joint senior authors
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Comments (0)