Effect of uterine manipulator on stage IB1 to IIA1 cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study

ElsevierVolume 204, January 2026, Pages 27-36Gynecologic OncologyAuthor links open overlay panel, , , , Highlights•

Uterine manipulator use does not impact 3-year and 5-year disease-free or overall survival.

Major intraoperative complications were comparable between groups.

Findings support that uterine manipulators remain safe, effective instruments in early-stage cervical cancer surgery.

AbstractObjective

This study aimed to evaluate the survival and surgical safety of using a uterine manipulator during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for early-stage cervical cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 673 patients with FIGO stage IB1 – IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent LRH between 2019 and 2022. Patients were divided into the uterine manipulator group (n = 395) and the uterine manipulator-free group (n = 278). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize confounding effects. Statistical analysis was conducted on perioperative characteristics, pathological results, and follow-up data.

Results

In the unmatched cohort, no significant differences were observed between the uterine manipulator and uterine manipulator-free groups in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (94.43 % [95 % CI, 92.20 % – 96.72 %] vs. 93.88 % [95 % CI, 91.11% – 96.74 %]; P = 0.88) or overall survival (OS) rates (98.47 % [95 % CI, 97.27 % – 99.69 %] vs. 96.76 % [95 % CI, 94.70 % – 98.86 %]; P = 0.72). In the PSM-matched cohort, 3-year DFS (P = 0.53) and OS (P = 0.94) also showed no significant difference. Five-year survival rates were consistent with these findings. After PSM, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified FIGO stage (2018) IIA1 (HR, 5.82; 95 % CI, 1.11–30.69; P = 0.038) and ovarian invasion (HR, 26.82; 95 % CI, 1.22–589.87; P = 0.037) as the independent risk factors for 3-year DFS. No significant differences were found in major intraoperative complications.

Conclusion

In patients with FIGO stage IB1 – IIA1 cervical cancer, uterine manipulator use during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy does not impact survival and safety.

Keywords

Cervical cancer

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Oncological safety

Prognosis

Uterine manipulator

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Comments (0)

No login
gif