Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 491–497.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anderson, R. C., & Klofstad, C. A. (2012). For love or money? The influence of personal resources and environmental resource pressures on human mate preferences. Ethology, 118, 841–849.

Article  Google Scholar 

Apicella, C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 508–518.

Article  Google Scholar 

Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. Culture and Public Action, 59, 62–63.

Google Scholar 

Balaresque, P., et al. (2015). Y-chromosome descent clusters and male differential reproductive success: Young lineage expansions dominate Asian pastoral nomadic populations. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23, 1413–1422.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bateson, P., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions: An appreciation and an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 712–718.

Article  Google Scholar 

Beladi, H., Marjit, S., & Hati, K. K. (2024). Growth impact of status seeking behavior: A counter example. Economics and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12257

Article  Google Scholar 

Bentley, R. A. (2022). Prehistory of kinship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 51, 137–154.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (1997). Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; Reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology, 103, 681–699.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: Comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 309–317.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blöcher, J., et al. (2023). Descent, marriage, and residence practices of a 3,800-year-old pastoral community in Central Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120, Article e2303574120.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bogaard, A., Fochesato, M., & Bowles, S. (2019). The farming-inequality nexus: New insights from ancient Western Eurasia. Antiquity, 93, 1129–1143.

Article  Google Scholar 

Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1987). On cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. American Anthropologist, 89, 617–634.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bräuer, G., & Chopra, V. (1978). Estimation of the heritability of hair and eye color. Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht über die Biologisch-Anthropologische Literatur, 36, 109–120.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brooks, R., et al. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 810–812.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brooks, R. C., Blake, K. R., & Fromhage, L. (2022). Effects of gender inequality and wealth inequality on within-sex mating competition under hypergyny. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 501–509.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cheng, J. T. & Kornienko, O. (2020). The neurobiology of human social behavior: A review of how testosterone and cortisol underpin competition and affiliation dynamics. Salivary Bioscience: Foundations of Interdisciplinary Saliva Research and Applications, 519–553.

Chevalier, L., De Coligny, F., & Labonne, J. (2022). A demogenetic individual based model for the evolution of traits and genome architecture under sexual selection. Peer Community Journal, 2, Article e8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark, G. (2023). The inheritance of social status: England, 1600 to 2022. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120, Article e2300926120.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Collins, J., Baer, B., & Weber, E. J. (2015). Sexual selection, conspicuous consumption and economic growth. Journal of Bioeconomics, 17, 189–206.

Article  Google Scholar 

Courtiol, A., Pettay, J. E., Jokela, M., Rotkirch, A., & Lummaa, V. (2012). Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8044–8049.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chu, A. C., Fan, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Status-seeking culture and development of capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 275–290.

Article  Google Scholar 

Daly, H. E. (1974). The economics of the steady state. The American Economic Review, 64, 15–21.

Google Scholar 

Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics: with new essays. (Island press).

Dreżewski, R. (2018). The agent-based model and simulation of sexual selection and pair formation mechanisms. Entropy, 20, 342.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dupor, B., & Liu, W.-F. (2003). Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. American Economic Review, 93, 423–428.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eisenegger, C., Kumsta, R., Naef, M., Gromoll, J., & Heinrichs, M. (2017). Testosterone and androgen receptor gene polymorphism are associated with confidence and competitiveness in men. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 93–102.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ellis, E. C. (2015). Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecological Monographs, 85, 287–331.

Article  Google Scholar 

Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fales, M. R., et al. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fedurek, P., et al. (2020). Status does not predict stress: Women in an egalitarian hunter–gatherer society. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 2, Article e44.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2023). Increasing pressure on US men for income in order to find a spouse. Biodemography and Social Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2023.2220950

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Genicot, G., & Ray, D. (2017). Aspirations and inequality. Econometrica, 85, 489–519.

Article  Google Scholar 

Genicot, G., & Ray, D. (2020). Aspirations and economic behavior. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 715–746.

Article  Google Scholar 

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971)The entropy law and the economic process. (Harvard university press).

Glowacki, L., & Wrangham, R. (2015). Warfare and reproductive success in a tribal population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 348–353.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goody, J. & Tambiah, S. J. (1973). Bridewealth and dowry. (CUP Archive).

Grebe, N. M., et al. (2019). Testosterone, cortisol, and status-striving personality features: A review and empirical evaluation of the dual hormone hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 109, 25–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024). Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck. Nature Communications, 15, 3243.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harper, K. T., Sidari, M. J. & Zietsch, B. P. (2023). Agent-Based Modelling shows that Operation of Fisher’s Principle does not explain Zero Heritability in Human Offspring Sex Ratio. bioRxiv, 2023.2004. 2004.535652.

Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (2001). Hunting and nuclear families: Some lessons from the Hadza about men’s work. Current Anthropology, 42, 681–709.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hemelrijk, C. (2002). Despotic societies, sexual attraction and the emergence of male’tolerance’: An agent-based model. Behaviour, 139, 729–747.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heyer, E., et al. (2015). Patrilineal populations show more male transmission of reproductive success than cognatic populations in Central Asia, which reduces their genetic diversity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 157, 537–543.