Effect of region of interest settings on diagnostic performance of attenuation imaging in hepatic steatosis

Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol. 2023;79:1542–56.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Younossi ZM, Zelber-Sagi S, Lazarus JV, et al. Global consensus recommendations for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2025;169:1017–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Targher G, Byrne CD, Tilg H. MASLD: a systemic metabolic disorder with cardiovascular and malignant complications. Gut. 2024;73:691–702.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL–EASD–EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64:1388–402.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sterling RK, Duarte-Rojo A, Patel K, et al. AASLD practice guideline on imaging-based noninvasive liver disease assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis. Hepatology. 2025;81:672–724.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, et al. WFUMB guidelines/guidance on liver multiparametric ultrasound. Part 2: guidance on liver fat quantification. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024;50:1088–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karlas T, Petroff D, Sasso M, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol. 2017;66:1022–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petroff D, Blank V, Newsome PN, et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter using the M and XL probes: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:185–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Roccarina D, Barr RG. Intersystem and interoperator agreement of US attenuation coefficient for quantifying liver steatosis. Radiology. 2024;313:e240162.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Maiocchi L, Raciti MV, et al. Detection of liver steatosis with a novel ultrasound-based technique: a pilot study using MRI-derived proton density fat fraction as the gold standard. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019;10:e00081.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burgio MD, Castera L, Oufighou M, et al. Prospective comparison of attenuation imaging and controlled attenuation parameter for liver steatosis diagnosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22:1005-1013.e27.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nishimura T, Tada T, Akita T, et al. Diagnostic performance of attenuation imaging versus controlled attenuation parameter for hepatic steatosis with MRI-based proton density fat fraction as the reference standard: a prospective multicenter study. J Gastroenterol. 2025;60:727–37.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee DH. Quantitative assessment of fatty liver using ultrasound attenuation imaging. J Med Ultrason. 2021;48:465–70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hamaguchi M, Kojima T, Itoh Y, et al. The severity of ultrasonographic findings in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease reflects the metabolic syndrome and visceral fat accumulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2708–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Wong V-WS, Castera L, et al. Liver ultrasound elastography: an update to the world federation for ultrasound in medicine and biology guidelines and recommendations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44:2419–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, et al. WFUMB guideline/guidance on liver multiparametric ultrasound: part 1. Update to 2018 guidelines on liver ultrasound elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2024;50:1071–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tada T, Iijima H, Kobayashi N, et al. Usefulness of attenuation imaging with an ultrasound scanner for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:2679–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tada T, Kumada T, Gotoh T, et al. Validation of a B-mode ultrasonography scoring system for assessing liver steatosis: a comparison with MRI-derived proton density fat fraction. Hepatol Res. 2025;55:818–29.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hobeika C, Ronot M, Guiu B, et al. Ultrasound-based steatosis grading system using 2D-attenuation imaging: an individual patient data meta-analysis with external validation. Hepatology. 2025;81:212–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choullamy T, Kaadi L, Bezdikian A, et al. Liver fat quantification with ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2025;41:e00712.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Raimondi A, Maiocchi L, et al. Liver fat quantification with ultrasound: depth dependence of attenuation coefficient. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42:2247–55.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Burgio MD, et al. US markers and necroinflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease: the iLEAD study. Radiology. 2024;312:e233377.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jesper D, Klett D, Schellhaas B, et al. Ultrasound-based attenuation imaging for the non-invasive quantification of liver fat - a pilot study on feasibility and inter-observer variability. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020;8:1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Maiocchi L, Savietto G, et al. Performance of the attenuation imaging technology in the detection of liver steatosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40:1325–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraioli G, Roccarina D, Barr RG. Attenuation coefficient for hepatic steatosis using a single ultrasound system: associations of measurement parameters with interoperator agreement and diagnostic performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025;224:e2532746.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogawa S, Kumada T, Gotoh T, et al. A comparative study of hepatic steatosis using two different qualitative ultrasound techniques measured based on magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction. Hepatol Res. 2024;54:638–54.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sugimoto K, Abe M, Oshiro H, et al. The most appropriate region-of-interest position for attenuation coefficient measurement in the evaluation of liver steatosis. J Med Ultrason. 2021;48:615–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bi M, Liu F, Yu J, et al. Preliminary study on determining the optimal position of region of interest for evaluating hepatic steatosis using ultrasound attenuation imaging. Abdom Radiol. 2025;50:4380–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tanaka S, Ohba N, Abe K, et al. The coefficient of determination is affected by the attenuation coefficient in attenuation imaging. Lab Med Int. 2023;2:42–9.

Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif