Akiha, K., Brigham, E., Couch, B. A., Lewin, J., Stains, M., Stetzer, M., Vinson, E., & Smith, M. K. (2018). What types of instructional shifts do students experience? Investigating active learning in science, technology, engineering, and math classes across key transition points from middle school to the university level. Frontiers in Education, 2, 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068

Article  Google Scholar 

Alkhouri, J. S., Donham, C., Pusey, T. S., Signorini, A., Stivers, A. H., & Kranzfelder, P. (2021). Look who’s talking: Teaching and discourse practices across discipline, position, experience, and class size in STEM college classrooms. BioScience, 71(10), 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab077

Article  Google Scholar 

Anguera, M. T., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Losada, J. L., & Portell, M. (2018). Pautas para elaborar trabajos que utilizan la metodología observacional. Anuario de psicología, 48(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.02.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Anwar, S., & Menekse, M. (2021). A systematic review of observation protocols used in postsecondary STEM classrooms. Review of Education, 9(1), 81-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3235

Article  Google Scholar 

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Budd, D. A., Van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., McConnell, D. A., & Vislova, T. (2013). Characterizing teaching in introductory geology courses: Measuring classroom practices. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 461–475. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1163984.pdf

Campbell, C. M., Cabrera, A. F., Michel, J. O., & Patel, S. (2017). From comprehensive to singular: A latent class analysis of college teaching practices. Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9440-0

Cullinan, J., Flannery, D., Harold, J., Lyons, S., & Palcic, D. (2021). The disconnected: COVID-19 and disparities in access to quality broadband for higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00262-1

DeCamp, W., Horvitz, B., Garza Mitchell, R. L., Kowalske, M. G., & Singleton, C. (2022). Development of a self-report instrument for measuring online teaching practices and discussion facilitation. Plos One, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275880

Denaro, K., Sato, B., Harlow, A., Aebersold, A. & Verma, M. (2021). Comparison of Cluster Analysis Methodologies for Characterization of Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) Data. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077

Denaro, K., Kranzfelder, P., Owens, M. T., Sato, B., Zuckerman, A. L., Hardesty, R. A., ... & Lo, S. M. (2022). Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00365-9

Eddy, S. L., Converse, M. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2015). PORTAAL: A classroom observation tool assessing evidence-based teaching practices for active learning in large science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095

Engel, O., Zimmer, L. M., Lorz, M., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023). Digital studying in times of COVID-19: teacher- and student-related aspects of learning success in german higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00382-w

Engestrom, Y. (1996). Interobjectivity, ideality, and dialectics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 259–265

Escobar-Pérez, J. y Cuervo-Martínez, Á. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27–36. https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r161r/w25645w/Juicio_de_expertos_u4.pdf

Ferrare, J. J. (2019). A multi-institutional analysis of instructional beliefs and practices in gateway courses to the sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), ar26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0257

Ferrare, J. J. & Hora, M. T. (2014). Cultural models of teaching and learning in math and science: Exploring the intersections of culture, cognition, and pedagogical situations. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(6), 792-825. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0030

Article  Google Scholar 

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Article  Google Scholar 

González, C., Ponce, D. & Fernández, V. (2023). Teachers’ experiences of teaching online during COVID-19: implications for postpandemic professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10200-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/669901

Article  Google Scholar 

Guimarães, B., & Lima, R. (2021). A systematic literature review of classroom observation protocols and their adequacy for engineering education in active learning environments, European Journal of Engineering Education, 46:6, 908-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1937946

Article  Google Scholar 

Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021

Article  Google Scholar 

Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2020). Folk pedagogies for teacher transitions: Approaches to synchronous online learning in the wake of COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.70725/410492lqewwm

Hora, M. T., & Ferrare, J. J. (2013). Instructional systems of practice: A multidimensional analysis of math and science undergraduate course planning and classroom teaching. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 212–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.729767

Horvitz, B. S., DeCamp, W., Mitchell, R. G., Kowalske, M., & Singleton, C. (2024). Developing an observation protocol for online STEM courses. Plos One, 19(1), e0297359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297359

Article  Google Scholar 

Hosmer, D. W., Jovanovic, B. & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Best subsets logistic regression. Biometrics, 1265–1270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531779

Jacobus, A., Kunzler, J., Storck, J. B., & da Rocha, M. A. M. (2022). Expansion of Distance Education in higher education: Trajectories in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Colombia. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 35(2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.24298

Jao, L., Wiseman, D., Kobiela, M., Gonsalves, A., & Savard, A. (2018). Practice-based pedagogy in mathematics and science teaching methods: Challenges and adaptations in context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18, 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0009-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2003). Developing classroom-focused research in technology education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150309556551

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801

Book  Google Scholar 

Kranzfelder, P., Lo, A. T., Melloy, M. P., Walker, L. E. & Warfa, A. R. M. (2019). Instructional practices in reformed undergraduate STEM learning environments: A study of instructor and student behaviors in biology courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1944-1961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1649503

Article  Google Scholar 

Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786

Lund, T. J., Pilarz, M., Velasco, J. B., Chakraverty, D., Rosploch, K., Undersander, M. & Stains, M. (2015). The best of both worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP observation protocols to easily and reliably measure various levels of reformed instructional practice. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar18. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168

Mahapatra, S. K. (2021). Online formative assessment and feedback practices of ESL teachers in India, Bangladesh and Nepal: A multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00603-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009

Meaders, C. L., Toth, E. S., Lane, A. K., Shuman, J. K., Couch, B. A., Stains, M., ... & Smith, M. K. (2019). “What will i experience in my college STEM courses?” An investigation of student predictions about instructional practices in introductory courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar60. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1766204

Moser, K. M., Wei, T. & Brenner, D. (2021). Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System, 97, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431

Article  Google Scholar 

Pusey, T. S., Valencia, A. P., Signorini, A., & Kranzfelder, P. (2023). Breakout Rooms, Polling, and Chat, Oh COPUS! The Adaptation of COPUS for Online Synchronous Learning. Research & Practice in Assessment, 18(1).

Reinholz, D. L., Stone-Johnstone, A., White, I., Sianez Jr, L. M. & Shah, N. (2020). A pandemic crash course: Learning to teach equitably in synchronous online classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(4), ar60. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0126

Rudin, J., D’Intino, R., Fleming, R., Nicholson, J., & Jovanovski, S. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on prior and current learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(4), 1047-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2022-0088

Article  Google Scholar 

Sandrone, S., Scott, G., Anderson, W. J., & Musunuru, K. (2021). Active learning-based STEM education for in-person and online learning. Cell, 184(6), 1409-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.045

Article  Google Scholar 

Sbeglia, G. C., Goodridge, J. A., Gordon, L. H., & Nehm, R. H. (2021). Are faculty changing? How reform frameworks, sampling intensities, and instrument measures impact inferences about student-centered teaching practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), ar39. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-11-0259

Schneider, M. & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098

Article  Google Scholar 

Singh, J., Evans, E., Reed, A., Karch, L., Qualey, K., Singh, L., & Wiersma, H. (2022). Online, hybrid, and face-to-face learning through the eyes of faculty, students, administrators, and instructional designers: Lessons learned and directions for the post-vaccine and post-pandemic/COVID-19 world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(3), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211063754

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith, C. D., & Baik, C. (2021). High-impact teaching practices in higher education: a best evidence review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1696-1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1698539

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H., Gilbert, S. L. & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154

Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M., Esson, J., Knight, J., Laski, F., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C., Lo, S., Mcdonnell, L., Mckay, T., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M., Plank, K., ... Young, A. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892

Surahman, E., & Pratama, U. N. (2021). Online Observation Protocol to Supervise Online Learning and Its Sample Report. In 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2021) (pp. 6–12). Atlantis Press.

Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J. K., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., ... & Iverson, E. (2017). A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere, 13(2), 608–627. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01479.1

Teasdale, R., Ryker, K., Viskupic, K., Czajka, C. D. & Manduca, C. (2020). Transforming education with community-developed teaching materials: evidence from direct observations of STEM college classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00251-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Van der Laan, M., Pollard, K. & Bryan, J. (2003). A new partitioning around medoids algorithm. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 73(8), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/0094965031000136012

Article  Google Scholar 

Vlachopoulos, D. & Makri, A. (2021). Quality teaching in online higher education: The perspectives of 250 online tutors on technology and pedagogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(6), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i06.20173

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang, D. (2017). Instructional strategies and course design for teaching statistics online: perspectives from online students. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0096-x

York, A. M., Fink, A., Stoen, S. M., Walck-Shannon, E. M., Wally, C. M., Luo, J., ... & Frey, R. F. (2021). Gender inequity in individual participation within physics and science, technology, engineering, and math courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020140. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.020140