Objectives: Academic medical institutions are the gatekeepers of the physician workforce and shape the future of medicine by regulating medical school admissions as well as residency training. Although broadly the field of medicine is seeing more representation from traditionally underrepresented groups, the critical decision-making platform of academic medicine continues to be uncharacteristically homogeneous, represented mainly by white males. This is even more pronounced in surgical subspecialties, such as academic neurosurgery. This study aims to quantify this phenomenon, uncover its driving factors, and define opportunities for improvement. Methods: Using a mixed research methodology, academic neurosurgical faculty in the U.S were identified, and their demographic data was collected. An internet search using Google Scholar and Scopus was conducted to determine scholarly activity using number of publications and h-index. Results: We found a significant increase in female faculty in academic neurosurgery within the last decade. Comparing the faculty rank amongst male and female faculty, we found that the majority of female faculty are at the assistant professor level (n=36/79; 45.6%) while male faculty are more at the full professor rank (n=265/582; 45.5%). A similar trend was seen for under-represented minority neurosurgery faculty. Strong scholarly activity corelated with a departmental chair position for male faculty, however, this trend was not true for female faculty. There was a significant difference in the number of publications and h-index in female vs male faculty, but only when including male faculty outliers at the full professor level. Conclusion: Slowly but steadily, academic neurosurgery is making progress towards a more diverse and representative workforce in the U.S that better reflects the patient population. Facilitating timely progression of females and URM neurosurgeons into senior professorship and academic leadership roles will further advance this essential progress.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors