Background: Increasing relevance of genetics and molecular biology in medicine necessitates greater genetic literacy among healthcare workers. To assess the literacy level, a validated genetic literacy questionnaire is needed. Therefore, a standardised Indonesian-language genetic literacy questionnaire is essential. Aims: We aimed to translate and validate three genetic literacy questionnaires (PUGGS, iGLAS, and UNC-GKS) for use among Indonesian medical students. We then evaluated genetic literacy levels using one of the validated questionnaires. Methods: The PUGGS, iGLAS, and UNC-GKS questionnaires were translated into Indonesian and then reviewed by an expert panel for translational accuracy and conceptual appropriateness. Back-translation was performed to confirm validity. Initial Indonesian versions of the questionnaires underwent cognitive pre-testing with 12 undergraduate medical students. After refinements, the questionnaires were validated among 34 first- to third-year medical students. The Indonesian version of UNC-GKS questionnaire was then used to assess genetic literacy of 486 medical students comprising 228 preclinical medical students, 187 clerkships, and 71 residents. Results: The Indonesian versions of PUGGS (Cronbach's α = 0.819) and UNC-GKS (α = 0.809) demonstrated good reliability, while iGLAS showed poor reliability (α = 0.315). Among the 486 students tested, 56% demonstrated moderate overall genetic literacy, and only 15.2% demonstrated good overall literacy. Basic genetic concepts were relatively well-understood with 54.3% having good literacy. On the contrary, gene variant's effects on health were poorly understood with only 9.7% having good literacy. Inheritance concepts were moderately understood with 24.9% having good literacy. Conclusion: The Indonesian translations of PUGGS and UNC-GKS are reliable tools for assessing genetic literacy among medical students. Using UNC-GKS, we observed predominantly moderate genetic literacy levels. Curriculum improvement to better integrate genetics education is essential to support its clinical applications.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was funded by Universitas Riau (No. 1419/UN19.5.1.3/PT.01.3/2022).

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical Review Board for Medicine & Health Research of Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Riau gave ethical approval for this work (No: B/105/UN19.5.1.1.8/UEPKK/2022).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.