Background High workload among healthcare workers has increasingly been correlated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient operational and financial outcomes, and burnout. Despite growing literature exploring causes of attending physician workload, there is limited understanding of trainee-specific measures.

Objective We aimed to characterize elements contributing to trainee workload and perceived challenges and satisfiers to the trainee workday as a foundation for better understanding and measuring trainee work experience.

Methods Internal Medicine and Medicine-Pediatrics residents at an academic medical center were invited to participate in focus groups discussing contributors to inpatient workload and work experience between March and April 2024. A qualitative content analysis identified key metrics of trainee workload and work experience, which were then consolidated into overarching domains. A structured, multi-round rating process ranked the perceived relevance of each metric.

Results Twenty residents participated across six focus groups. Analysis of focus groups yielded 297 workload metrics across 28 unique domains. Seventeen domains had metrics identified as highly relevant (median 6-7; IQR < 1) including autonomy, communication, disruptions, task switching, documentation, emotional burden, patient factors, professional fulfillment, rounding, teaming, and work-life balance.

Conclusions Resident physicians highlighted complex interactions between clinical factors, work design, and psychosocial dynamics that contribute to their sense of workload. This creates opportunities to develop unique measures of workload to understand the trainee experience better. Further studies are needed to capture the generalizability of these findings and the relationship between these workload domains and patient, organizational, and trainee outcomes with the aim of implementing evidence-based work design.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study was supported by internal organizational funds for participant incentives.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This project received an exempt, quality improvement determination from the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB#24-0303, 2/8/24).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable requested to the authors