Background: Prognostication after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) rarely captures long-term functional recovery, despite its importance to patients, families, and clinicians. Large trauma registries such as the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset contain detailed clinical data but lack systematic follow-up, limiting their ability to study longer-term functional outcomes. Methods: We developed and externally validated a machine learning model to predict favorable six-month functional outcome (GOS MD/GR or GOSE >=5) using harmonized data from two randomized clinical trials: CRASH (training) and ROC-TBI (validation). Five candidate classifiers (random forest [RF], linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, and support vector machine) were trained using seven shared clinical predictors. Models were evaluated using ROC-AUC, calibration metrics, and performance at the Youden optimal threshold and a high-sensitivity secondary threshold. The final model was applied to patients with moderate-to-severe TBI in the national TQIP registry (2017-2022) to estimate population-level recovery patterns. Results: The RF model demonstrated the highest overall performance after recalibration, achieving strong discrimination (AUC internal and external, 0.887 and 0.784), good calibration, and high sensitivity (0.890) and negative predictive value (0.909). Applied to 63,289 patients from TQIP, the model estimated that 45% would achieve favorable six-month outcomes at the Youden optimal threshold and 57% at the high-sensitivity threshold, with predicted recovery aligning with established clinical correlates such as younger age, higher admission GCS, and lower rates of penetrating or brainstem injuries. Conclusion: A machine learning model trained on high-quality trial data can generate clinically plausible estimates of long-term functional recovery when applied at scale to national trauma registries that lack systematic follow-up. This approach enables imputation of functional outcomes in datasets lacking follow-up, supports benchmarking and quality improvement across trauma systems, and provides a foundation for future models incorporating physiologic time-series, imaging, and biomarker data.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

CRASH: SRCTN74459797; ROC: NCT00316004

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of Johns Hopkins University gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors