Background Classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors has become increasingly complex over the past decade, raising concerns about the availability, feasibility and sustainability of comprehensive molecular diagnostics. We have evaluated nanopore whole genome sequencing (nWGS) as a single workflow to replace multiple diagnostic assays.
Methods We performed nWGS on DNA extracted from 90 adult CNS tumor samples (58 retrospective, 32 prospective) and compared the results to findings from standard of care (SoC) diagnostic work-up. Analysis was done through an automated workflow that consolidated diagnostically and therapeutically relevant genomic alterations, including copy-number variation, structural, and single-nucleotide variants, chromosomal aberrations, gene fusions and methylation-based classification.
Results Nanopore WGS enabled final diagnostic classification in all samples with >15% tumor cell content, requiring ∼3 hours of hands-on library preparation, parallel sample processing, and sequencing times within 72 hours. Methylation-based classification was available within 1 hour and was concordant with the integrated final diagnosis in 89% of cases (80/90). All diagnostically relevant copy-number variations, single-nucleotide variants, and gene fusions were concordant with standard-of-care testing, and MGMT promoter methylation status matched in 94% of cases. In addition, nWGS identified prognostic and potentially actionable variants that were not reported or covered by SoC.
Conclusions Nanopore WGS delivers comprehensive genetic and epigenetic results with a fast turn-around compared to standard methods. This enables efficient, accurate, and scalable molecular diagnostics of CNS tumors using a single platform. Its broad applicability supports its implementation in routine clinical practice and may be extended to other cancer types requiring complex genomic profiling.
Competing Interest StatementF.S. is a co-founder and shareholder of Heidelberg Epignostix GmbH. A.P. became a full-time employee of Heidelberg Epignostix GmbH in December 2024. A.P. and F.S. are inventors on a patent application related to a nanopore sequencing-based method for cancer characterization, filed by Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitat Heidelberg, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC (patent application number: 18682016). S.H., H.L. and E.O.V.M. have received reimbursement for travel, accommodation and conference fees to speak at events organized by ONT. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Clinical Protocolshttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.25.714119v2
Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from Norwegian South-Eastern regional health authorities [grant numbers 2021039, 2023059 to S.H., H.L. and E.O.V.M].
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee for South East Norway, approvals number 388359 and 853700).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Comments (0)