Background Evidence to guide the choice of injectable antibiotics and supportive care for children with severe pneumonia is limited and may not reflect changes in epidemiology associated with vaccination and antimicrobial resistance. Methods In this pragmatic, open-label, factorial, randomized trial conducted in 16 hospitals in Kenya, children aged 2-59 months with World Health Organization-defined severe pneumonia were assigned to receive one of three injectable antibiotic regimens: benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin (standard care), ceftriaxone, or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Eligible children were also randomly assigned to receive nasogastric tube feeding or intravenous fluids. The primary outcome was death from any cause by day 5 after enrollment. Results A total of 4393 children underwent randomization to the antibiotic groups, and 1064 to the supportive care groups. By day 5, deaths occurred in 87/1463 children (6.0%) receiving benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin, 82/1458 (5.6%) receiving amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.94; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 1.31), and 81/1462 (5.5%) receiving ceftriaxone (aRR vs. benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin, 0.95; 97.5% CI, 0.68 to 1.33). Death by day 5 occurred in 30/531 children (5.7%) receiving nasogastric tube feeding and 35/532 (6.7%) receiving intravenous fluids (aRR, 1.13; 97.5% CI, 0.71 to 1.79). Secondary outcomes were similar across groups. Conclusions Among children hospitalized with severe pneumonia, outcomes with benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin were similar to those with ceftriaxone or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and nasogastric tube feeding was similar to intravenous fluids with respect to mortality and safety. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04041791; Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202106720981298
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical TrialNCT04041791
Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme of the UK Department for International Development (DFID), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the UK Medical Research Council (MRC), and the Wellcome Trust. The funders provided financial support for the conduct of the trial. The authors and their institutions did not receive any additional payment or services from a third party for study design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit for publication. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, preparation of the manuscript or the decision to submit for publication.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Scientific and Ethics Review Unit of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, the Pharmacy and Poisons Board of Kenya, the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation of Kenya, and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee of the University of Oxford gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityData requests will be considered by applying to the Data Governance Committee at CGMR-C Kilifi who will manage the process and ensure that appropriate ethical approval is in place and consent has been obtained for uses outside those of the original scope of work.
Comments (0)