Objectives Although trauma clinical guidance has the potential to improve patient outcomes significantly, they are applied inconsistently across the United States today. Work is needed to improve guidance application among those who treat traumatic injury, including emergency medicine (EM) clinicians. A priority step of such improvement is the visual design of clinical directives, as it can markedly influence EM clinicians’ satisfaction and subsequent usage of guidance. This qualitative study aims to determine EM clinicians’ needs and preferences for the visual design of trauma clinical guidance.

Methods As part of a larger exploratory sequential mixed methods study exploring trauma clinical guidance barriers and facilitators, we conducted semi-structured video conference interviews during August and September 2024 with EM clinicians. Participants were selected through purposeful criteria and snowball sampling to ensure diverse representation across professional and personal characteristics. Interviews were audio recorded and analyzed through rapid qualitative content analysis.

Results Twelve EM clinicians completed interviews, providing feedback on their preferences for the visual design of trauma clinical guidance. Clinicians emphasized the need for simple guidance that can be easily used in a time-pressured setting. Dynamic features such as expandable or “clickable” content can provide deeper explanations of guidance concepts without compromising usability. Flowsheets and visual aids can clarify guidance recommendations. Clinicians asked that recommendations be specific and action-oriented.

Conclusion When designing trauma clinical guidance, authors should promote visual design characteristics that prioritize simplicity, dynamic features, visual aids, and specificity.

What is already known on this topic Trauma clinical guidance has limited usage today amongst EM clinicians for myriad reasons, among them cumbersome visual design practices that do not meet clinicians’ needs or preferences for guidance

What this study adds EM clinicians’ preferences for trauma clinical guidance visual design include prioritizing simplicity, leveraging dynamic features to add depth, using visual cues to enhance navigability, and building recommendations with specificity and actionable steps in mind

How this study might affect research, practice or policy Guidance authors and adaptors should prioritize these attributes as they produce future trauma clinical guidance, further reducing barriers to guidance usage amongst EM clinicians.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, CB F490; COMIRB #: 24-0047, and determined exempt from institutional review board and waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Limited (and deidentified) data produced through the present study are only available through reasonable request to the authors.