Efficacy of Improvised Cervical Immobilization Techniques in Remote Settings: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Introduction Cervical spine injuries in wilderness and austere environments present unique challenges due to the lack of commercial immobilization devices and prolonged evacuation times. Improvised cervical collars—made from items such as SAM® splints, rolled towels, or fleece garments—are frequently used in these settings, yet their biomechanical effectiveness and field practicality have not been systematically reviewed. This article synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of improvised cervical immobilization techniques used in remote environments.

Method We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) for studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed biomechanical or qualitative evaluations of improvised cervical immobilization methods in human volunteers or cadaveric models, with relevance to wilderness, prehospital, or austere settings. Eleven studies met inclusion criteria.

Results Findings suggest that improvised collars particularly SAM splints and rolled fleece or towel collars can reduce cervical motion to levels comparable to standard rigid collars in most planes of movement. Spray-foam devices demonstrated even greater stability in cadaveric models. Soft improvised collars consistently outperformed foam commercial collars in both stability and comfort. Improvised methods also showed favorable usability in the field, though their application requires proper training.

Conclusion Improvised cervical spine immobilization techniques can be biomechanically effective and operationally valuable in remote care contexts. When rigid collars are unavailable, well-applied improvised devices offer a viable alternative and should be included in wilderness medicine education. Further field-based research is warranted to evaluate real-world outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Comments (0)

No login
gif