Key points Question Can open-label placebos (OLP) reduce antidepressant discontinuation symptoms in patients with remitted major depression?
Findings This series of N-of-1 trials in 25 patients, over 8 weeks following antidepressant discontinuation, found small effects of OLP vs no treatment in reducing discontinuation symptoms. While the overall treatment effect did not reach the threshold of clinical meaningfulness, 38% of patients experienced a small benefit. Discontinuation symptoms were mostly mild, with few exceptions, and diminished over time.
Meaning These findings support the use of personalized approaches and suggest that open-label placebos may be beneficial for antidepressant discontinuation symptoms in some patients.
Importance Antidepressant discontinuation symptoms are highly prevalent and can be severe. Interventions leveraging the placebo effect have the potential to alleviate symptoms and facilitate the discontinuation process.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of open-label placebo (OLP) in reducing antidepressant discontinuation symptoms.
Design, Setting, And Participants A series of randomized, single-blinded, N-of-1 trials of OLP vs no treatment in an alternating order (ABAB, BABA). Patients with remitted major depressive disorder, reporting moderate to severe discontinuation symptoms after successful antidepressant discontinuation with state-of-the-art clinical supervision were enrolled between December 2021 to December 2023.
Interventions The OLP treatment consisted of a standardized verbal and written rationale and twice-daily placebo intake for two-week periods alternating with no treatment during the eight-week N-of-1 trial.
Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was discontinuation symptoms assessed twice daily by the Generic Rating Scale of Treatment Effects (0-10, with higher scores indicating greater discontinuation symptoms). Secondary outcomes were symptom expectations and depressive symptoms. Bayesian mixed models of individual and aggregated N-of-1 trial data were used to estimate posterior probabilities of treatment effect differences across different thresholds (>0 superior; ≥0.2 small effect; ≥0.8 clinically meaningful effect). Analyses were conducted as intention-to-treat.
Results A total of 25 patients (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [16.0] years; 80% females) with moderate to severe discontinuation symptom scores at baseline (mean [SD], 5.8 [1.4] severity) were enrolled. Among 21 patients analyzed at individual level, 13 showed improvements in discontinuation symptoms during OLP vs no treatment, 8 indicated small and none clinically meaningful effects. Aggregated Bayesian mixed models estimated a 76% posterior probability for a superior treatment effect, with a 53% for a small and 4% for a clinically meaningful effect. Overall discontinuation symptom burden was low and decreased over time. Adverse events did not differ significantly between OLP and no treatment; there were no serious adverse events.
Conclusion and Relevance This series of N-of-1 trials found OLP may improve discontinuation symptoms following clinician-supervised antidepressant discontinuation, but effects did not reach the threshold for clinical meaningfulness. Small effects in over one-third of patients indicate OLP may be a low-risk intervention for certain individuals after discontinuation.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical TrialNCT05051995
Clinical Protocolshttps://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-023-05184-y
Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) CRC 289 Treatment Expectation Project Number 422744262.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee of the Aerztekammer of Hamburg, Germany gave ethical approval for this work (approval number: PV7151).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityThe study protocol and statistical analysis plan are published, and the analytic code will be shared, deidentified patient data will be available upon reasonable request. All deidentified individual patient data, protocol, and analytic code will be available after publication without end date on request to researchers with a sound proposal.
Comments (0)