Previous studies reported greater knee extensor muscle weakness in female patients compared with males after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the mechanisms underlying this sex difference remain unclear. We investigated whether there are sex differences in muscle atrophy after ACL reconstruction. Rats were divided into four groups: Male control, male ACL reconstruction, female control, and female ACL reconstruction. To quantify the amount of weight-bearing, gait analysis was performed during the experimental period. Muscle atrophy was assessed by measuring muscle fiber cross-sectional area (CSA) at 7, 28, and 84 days after starting the experiment. In the rectus femoris, a similar extent of atrophy was observed at 7 days after ACL reconstruction, but atrophy recovered by 28 days in both males and females. However, at 84 days, rectus femoris atrophy occurred again in females only. In the semitendinosus and gastrocnemius, significant atrophy was detected at 7 days after ACL reconstruction in males, but not in females. Both males and females showed a reduction in weight-bearing early after ACL reconstruction, with a more pronounced reduction in males. Early semitendinosus and gastrocnemius atrophy was more severe in males, and this may be explained by differences in weight-bearing. Delayed rectus femoris atrophy, observed exclusively in females, may explain the weakened knee extensor strength observed in female patients.
Keywords ACL reconstruction - sex - muscle atrophy - muscle weakness - quadriceps Data Availability StatementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
A.K.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.
M.K.: Formal analysis, investigation, writing—review and editing.
K.Y.: Writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.
J.O.: Investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.
All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Publication HistoryReceived: 17 April 2025
Accepted: 06 November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
12 November 2025
Article published online:
25 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
Comments (0)