The Negative Impact of High Molecular Weight Hyaluronan on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Wound Repair

J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2712-4402

Authors Author Affiliations

James Rogot

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

Lance A. Murphy

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

Claire P. Pinnie

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

Matthew J. Pellicore

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

Howard J. Nicholson III

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

James L. Cook

2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States

Clark T. Hung

1   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States


Funding Information This work was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, (3R01AR068133-03S1), U.S. Department of Defense, (W81XWH2010583).  SFX Search Buy Article(opens in new window) Permissions and Reprints(opens in new window) Article preview thumbnailAbstract

Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has historically been the only method by which knee stability is restored following ACL rupture. Following ACL rupture, the torn ends of the ligament are exposed to the synovial environment, containing hyaluronan (HA), which has been implicated in the poor migratory function of ACL fibroblasts (ACLF). We hypothesize that the HA in synovial fluid attenuates the wound healing response of the ACL by inhibition of new focal adhesions between ACLF and the surrounding environment. Juvenile bovine ACLF were isolated and cultured in the presence of endogenous and exogenous high molecular weight HA (HMWHA) to monitor in vitro wound closure. Concurrently, cells were assayed for focal adhesion formation and adhesion strength. Next, human ACLF were cast into tissue-engineered constructs to assess their ability to contract within a 3D matrix after treatment with HA. A cellular viability assay was used to determine the cytotoxicity of HMWHA. Co-culture of synoviocytes with ACLF wounds demonstrated that HMWHA was the primary cause for attenuated wound healing. When exogenous HMWHA was cultured with ACLF, a dose-dependent negative correlation (r = −0.65, p < 0.001) in cell migration was observed. A significant decrease in the number and strength of focal adhesions was found to mirror the dose-dependent pattern. Collagen gel contraction was inhibited in the presence of HMWHA. Direct exposure of ACLF to HMWHA was shown to inhibit ACLF wound healing and contraction. As cytotoxicity remained unchanged, this decreased healing capacity is attributed to reduced focal adhesion formation and weakened adhesion strength of ACLF in the presence of HMWHA. This study identifies HMWHA exclusion as a potential therapeutic strategy and provides insight into the mechanism by which traditional primary repair of the ACL, as well as graft reconstructions, may fail.

Keywords ACL - tissue engineering - cell biology Publication History

Received: 09 May 2025

Accepted: 26 September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 September 2025

Article published online:
16 October 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
References 1 Riordan EA, Little C, Hunter D. Pathogenesis of post-traumatic OA with a view to intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014; 28 (01) 17-30 2 Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ. et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (06) 1502-1507 3 Dhammi IK, Rehan-Ul-Haq, Kumar S. Graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Indian J Orthop 2015; 49 (02) 127-128 4 Paterno MV. Incidence and predictors of second anterior cruciate ligament injury after primary reconstruction and return to sport. J Athl Train 2015; 50 (10) 1097-1099 5 Unal P, Samargandi R, Saad M, Turbillon C, Schmitt A, Berhouet J. Evaluation of retear rates following transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Functional outcomes and GNRB assessment with a mean 6.3-year follow-up. J Orthop 2024; 62: 56-61 6 Wright RW, Magnussen RA, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (12) 1159-1165 7 Li RT, Lorenz S, Xu Y, Harner CD, Fu FH, Irrgang JJ. Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (12) 2595-2603 8 Luc B, Gribble PA, Pietrosimone BG. Osteoarthritis prevalence following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and numbers-needed-to-treat analysis. J Athl Train 2014; 49 (06) 806-819 9 Dare D, Rodeo S. Mechanisms of post-traumatic osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014; 16 (10) 448 10 Han PF, Wei L, Duan ZQ. et al. Contribution of IL-1β, 6 and TNF-α to the form of post-traumatic osteoarthritis induced by “idealized” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a porcine model. Int Immunopharmacol 2018; 65: 212-220 11 Titchenal MR, Chu CR, Erhart-Hledik JC, Andriacchi TP. Early changes in knee center of rotation during walking after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction correlate with later changes in patient-reported outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (04) 915-921 12 Nguyen DT, Ramwadhdoebe TH, van der Hart CP, Blankevoort L, Tak PP, van Dijk CN. Intrinsic healing response of the human anterior cruciate ligament: an histological study of reattached ACL remnants. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (02) 296-301 13 Taylor SA, Khair MM, Roberts TR, DiFelice GS. Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (11) 2233-2247 14 Amiel D, Billings Jr E, Harwood FL. Collagenase activity in anterior cruciate ligament: protective role of the synovial sheath. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69 (03) 902-906 15 Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS. et al. Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (01) 37-43 16 Chen B, Zhang J, Nie D, Zhao G, Fu FH, Wang JHC. Characterization of the structure of rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and its stem/progenitor cells. J Cell Biochem 2018; 120 (05) 7446-7457 17 Haus J, Refior HJ. A study of the synovial and ligamentous structure of the anterior cruciate ligament. Int Orthop 1987; 11 (02) 117-124 18 Blewis ME, Nugent-Derfus GE, Schmidt TA, Schumacher BL, Sah RL. A model of synovial fluid lubricant composition in normal and injured joints. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13: 26-39 19 Schmidt TA, Gastelum NS, Nguyen QT, Schumacher BL, Sah RL. Boundary lubrication of articular cartilage: role of synovial fluid constituents. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56 (03) 882-891 20 Andrish J, Holmes R. Effects of synovial fluid on fibroblasts in tissue culture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 279-283 21 Wiig M, Abrahamsson SO, Lundborg G. Effects of hyaluronan on cell proliferation and collagen synthesis: a study of rabbit flexor tendons in vitro. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (04) 599-604 22 Estell EG, Murphy LA, Silverstein AM. et al. Fibroblast-like synoviocyte mechanosensitivity to fluid shear is modulated by interleukin-1α. J Biomech 2017; 60: 91-99 23 Moffat KL, Sun WHS, Chahine NO. et al. Characterization of the Mechanical Properties and Mineral Distribution of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-to-Bone Insertion Site. In: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2006: 2366-2369 24 Proffen BL, McElfresh M, Fleming BC, Murray MM. A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species. Knee 2012; 19 (04) 493-499 25 Oueslati N, Leblanc P, Harscoat-Schiavo C. et al. CTAB turbidimetric method for assaying hyaluronic acid in complex environments and under cross-linked form. Carbohydr Polym 2014; 112: 102-108 26 Suarez-Arnedo A, Torres Figueroa F, Clavijo C, Arbeláez P, Cruz JC, Muñoz-Camargo C. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. PLoS One 2020; 15 (07) e0232565 27 Temple-Wong MM, Ren S, Quach P. et al. Hyaluronan concentration and size distribution in human knee synovial fluid: variations with age and cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 2016; 18: 18 28 Evanko SP, Potter-Perigo S, Petty LJ, Workman GA, Wight TN. Hyaluronan controls the deposition of fibronectin and collagen and modulates TGF-β1 induction of lung myofibroblasts. Matrix Biol 2015; 42: 74-92 29 Laterra J, Culp LA. Differences in hyaluronate binding to plasma and cell surface fibronectins. Requirement for aggregation. J Biol Chem 1982; 257 (02) 719-726 30 Yamada KM, Kennedy DW, Kimata K, Pratt RM. Characterization of fibronectin interactions with glycosaminoglycans and identification of active proteolytic fragments. J Biol Chem 1980; 255 (13) 6055-6063 31 Hayman EG, Ruoslahti E. Distribution of fetal bovine serum fibronectin and endogenous rat cell fibronectin in extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 1979; 83 (01) 255-259 32 Hirsh SL, McKenzie DR, Nosworthy NJ, Denman JA, Sezerman OU, Bilek MMM. The Vroman effect: competitive protein exchange with dynamic multilayer protein aggregates. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2013; 103: 395-404 33 Parisi L, Toffoli A, Ghezzi B, Mozzoni B, Lumetti S, Macaluso GM. A glance on the role of fibronectin in controlling cell response at biomaterial interface. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2020; 56 (01) 50-55 34 Ahn KH, Park ES, Choi CY, Cha HG, Hwang Y, Nam SM. Hyaluronic acid treatment improves healing of the tenorrhaphy site by suppressing adhesions through extracellular matrix remodeling in a rat model. Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13 (06) 928 35 Evangelopoulos DS, Kohl S, Schwienbacher S, Gantenbein B, Exadaktylos A, Ahmad SS. Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (08) 2414-2419 36 Fleming BC, Spindler KP, Palmer M, Magarian E, Murray MM. Collagen-platelet composites improve the biomechanical properties of healing ACL grafts in a porcine model. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (08) 1554-1563 37 Ciceklidag M, Kaya I, Ayanoglu T. et al. Proprioception after primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 2024; 52 (05) 1199-1208 38 Saad Berreta R, Villarreal-Espinosa JB, Pallone L. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament repair results in similar patient-reported outcome measures as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of prospective comparative studies. Arthroscopy 2025; 41 (07) 2648-2665 39 Kiapour AM, Sieker JT, Proffen BL, Lam TT, Fleming BC, Murray MM. Synovial fluid proteome changes in ACL injury-induced posttraumatic osteoarthritis: proteomics analysis of porcine knee synovial fluid. PLoS One 2019; 14 (03) e0212662 40 Vermeijden HD, Monaco E, Marzilli F. et al. Primary repair versus reconstruction in patients with bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries: what do patients prefer?. Adv Orthop 2022; 2022: 3558311 41 Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (09) 971-980
 

Comments (0)

No login
gif