Available online 18 February 2026, 151206
Author links open overlay panelMatthew Nasra 1 2, Abhinaba Chatterjee 1 2, Michael A. Zacchilli 1 2 3Show moreAbstractThe treatment of knee malalignment has entered a renaissance period. Recent refinement in our understanding of the disease process continues to support early intervention strategies and corrective surgeries. MRI imaging provides the potential for the early detection of chondral damage and may enhance our ability to accurately indicate patients when they become clinically available. Available advanced imaging modalities including weightbearing CT, EOS®, and hybrid three-dimensional modeling are in the early phases of clinical implementation but are already revolutionizing presurgical planning. A deeper understanding of soft tissue balance is helping surgeons systematically reduce outliers in surgical correction. Utilizing these resources, surgeons are increasingly capable of addressing deformity in multiple planes while accounting for concomitant procedures. Even in salvage situations, new surgical options such as the implantable shock absorber are diversifying surgical treatment options for malalignment patients. In summary, innovation is driving rapid growth in the treatment of knee malalignment which may herald a new era in osteotomy.
IntroductionKnee malalignment is a major contributor to disability in orthopedic populations. It predisposes to early stages of joint degeneration and chondromalacia and directly impacts the progression of osteoarthritis. It is also a major contributing factor to meniscal pathology, ligamentous injury, and patellar instability while simultaneously impacting the failure rate of surgeries designed to address these pathologies. The surgical correction of malalignment is therefore a logical target for surgeons to preserve healthy joints and treat diseased joints. In the late 19th century, the treatment of malalignment through corrective osteotomy was introduced as an innovative treatment strategy in the field. Nonetheless, challenges in accurately and safely correcting malalignment, coupled with the emergence of arthroplasty a century later, have stunted the utilization of alignment correction surgeries over the last four decades. However, recent innovations in our understanding of disease progression, evaluation of patients, and surgical planning and instrumentation may herald the reemergence of osteotomy as a core treatment option.
Access through your organizationCheck access to the full text by signing in through your organization.
Access through your organizationSection snippetsNatural History of Knee MalalignmentKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most prevalent chronic musculoskeletal disorders and a major contributor to global disability, affecting 22% of adults over the age of 40 and contributing to billions of dollars in healthcare expenditures annually. Among the numerous biomechanical and biological factors associated with knee OA, lower limb malalignment has emerged as an important determinant of disease initiation and progression.1,2
Research has confirmed that knee malalignment magnifies the
ClassificationSeveral assessment tools have been developed to describe knee malalignment and provide a framework for understanding its biomechanical and clinical implications. Traditional evaluation relies on standard measurements of MPTA and LDFA (both anatomic and mechanical), the Hip–Knee–Ankle (HKA) angle, Mechanical Axis Deviation (MAD), and the Joint Line Convergence Angle (JLCA) to quantify the magnitude and location of coronal plane deformity. More comprehensive strategies, such as the system
Surgical PlanningPrecise surgical planning is essential for achieving optimal results in knee malalignment surgery. Ideal postoperative limb alignment is strongly associated with improved clinical outcomes. Under-correction is linked to early failure, increased risk of revision osteotomies or arthroplasty, and inferior patient reported outcomes. Conversely, over-correction may result in poor cosmesis, lateral compartment degeneration, increased shear stress on cartilage, and persistent pain.
Deformity-based PlanningA fundamental
Rehab: WeightbearingPostoperative rehabilitation after owHTO remains a topic of ongoing debate, particularly regarding the timing and extent of weight-bearing. One of the primary considerations is the need for bony union at the osteotomy site, which influences time to weightbearing. Despite the increasing frequency of OWHTO in clinical practice, there is currently no clear consensus among osteotomy surgeons for a postoperative protocol, and many surgeons continue to adopt a conservative approach to weightbearing.86
ConclusionMalalignment is common in the general population and has clearly been implicated as a risk factor for joint degeneration. Our understanding of progressive natural history of malalignment is rapidly increasing, and our understanding of kinesiology and imaging characteristics has improved our ability to classify malalignment. Novel imaging techniques including MRI bone biomarkers and sub-segmented chondral T2 relaxation may allow for more accurate prediction of joint degeneration before chondral
Declaration of competing interest"Dr. Zacchilli is a member of the AANA Emerging Leaders and Communications and Technology Committees and has received compensation as a paid consultant for Globus Medical. The remaining authors declare no competing interests."
AcknowledgmentsNone
References (88)D.H. Lee et al.Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of navigation and radiologic limb alignment measurements after high tibial osteotomyArthroscopy
(2012)
YS. LeeEditorial Commentary: Patient-specific instrumentation for knee high tibial osteotomy addresses the bony but not the soft-tissue aspect of deformity correctionArthroscopy
(2022)
M. Munier et al.Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2017)
C.A. Schneble et al.Three-dimensional imaging of the patellofemoral joint improves understanding of trochlear anatomy and pathology and planning of realignmentArthroscopy
(2025)
N. Tardy et al.Is patient-specific instrumentation more precise than conventional techniques and navigation in achieving planned correction in high tibial osteotomy?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
(2020)
Z.S. Aman et al.Improved accuracy of coronal alignment can be attained using 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation for knee osteotomies: a systematic review of level III and IV studiesArthroscopy
(2022)
K.J. Aalderink et al.Rehabilitation following high tibial osteotomyClin Sports Med
(2010)
L. Sharma et al.The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritisJAMA
(2001)
R. Cerejo et al.The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of diseaseArthritis Rheum
(2002)
S. Tanamas et al.Does knee malalignment increase the risk of development and progression of knee osteoarthritis? A systematic reviewArthritis Rheum
(2009)
S. Cahue et al.Varus-valgus alignment in the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritisArthritis Rheum
(2004)
F.B. Imhoff et al.The complexity of bony malalignment in patellofemoral disorders: femoral and tibial torsion, trochlear dysplasia, TT–TG distance, and frontal mechanical axis correlate with each otherKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2020)
D.J. Hunter et al.Knee alignment does not predict incident osteoarthritis: the Framingham Osteoarthritis StudyArthritis Rheum
(2007)
D.T. Felson et al.Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: Findings from the multicenter osteoarthritis study and the osteoarthritis initiativeArthritis Rheum
(2013)
J.P. Jackson et al.Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the kneeJ Bone Joint Surg Br
(1958)
G. Spahn et al.Factors that influence high tibial osteotomy results in patients with medial compartment arthritisKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2014)
G. Schmidt et al.Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: modern concepts and indicationsOrthop Clin North Am
(2020)
C.C. Prodromos et al.A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomyJ Bone Joint Surg Am
(1985)
D.C. Lee et al.High tibial osteotomyKnee Surg Relat Res
(2012)
J.M. Brinkman et al.Early results of open-wedge distal femoral varus osteotomyKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2011)
J.W. Wang et al.The results of distal femoral varus osteotomy for valgus knee osteoarthritisJ Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005)
T. Aiyama et al.Histological evidence of cartilage repair after high tibial osteotomyKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2017)
B. Ollivier et al.Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritisKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2021)
T.M. Van Raaij et al.Survival of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the kneeActa Orthop
(2008)
A.E. Staubli et al.Long-term follow-up after open-wedge high tibial osteotomyKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2018)
T.T. Niinimäki et al.Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: long-term outcomesJ Arthroplasty
(2014)
M.S. Wong et al.Cost-effectiveness of high tibial osteotomy versus total knee arthroplasty in younger patientsKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2020)
T.P. Andriacchi et al.A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the kneeClin Orthop Relat Res
(2004)
E.J. McWalter et al.Relationship between varus-valgus alignment and patellar kinematics in individuals with knee osteoarthritisJ Bone Joint Surg Am
(2007)
N.J. MacIntyre et al.Patellofemoral joint kinematics in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndromeJ Bone Joint Surg Am
(2006)
A. Hirschmann et al.Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2017)
T.J. Dietrich et al.End-stage extension of the knee and its influence on tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance in asymptomatic volunteersKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2014)
K. Izadpanah et al.Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignmentKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
(2014)
Z.S. Chaudhry et al.Gait adaptations and knee joint kinetics after osteotomy for malalignmentGait Posture
(2021)
View more referencesView full text© 2026 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Comments (0)