Effect of test distance on refraction bias at 3 m, 5 m, and optical 5 m, compared with 20 m

Lee, J.E.: Visual acuity test. In: Lee, J.S. (ed.) Primary Eye Examination: A Comprehensive Guide to Diagnosis, pp. 1–12. Springer, Singapore (2019)

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Ma, S., Li, C., Sun, J., Yang, J., Wen, K., Chen, X., Zhao, F., Sun, X., Tian, F.: Comparative analysis of eighteen IOL power calculation formulas using a modified formula performance index across diverse biometric parameters. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 273, 221–230 (2025)

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, J., Lu, Y., Liu, J., Wei, C.: Meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, stability and predictability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia. Lasers Med. Sci. 39, 57 (2024)

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen, X., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Cheng, M., Han, T., Niu, L., Wang, X., Zhou, X.: Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia. Eye Vis. (Lond). 8, 40 (2021)

Article  Google Scholar 

Kamiya, K., Shimizu, K., Takahashi, M., Ando, W., Hayakawa, H., Shoji, N.: Eight-year outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port for moderate to high ametropia. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 8, 799078 (2021)

Article  Google Scholar 

Kaiser, P.K.: Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis). An AOS thesis. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 107, 311–324 (2009)

International Organization for Standardization: Ophthalmic optics—Visual acuity testing—Standard and clinical optotypes and their presentation (ISO 8596:2017). ISO, Geneva (2017)

Google Scholar 

Japanese Standards Association: Visual acuity testing equipment (JIS T 7309:2002). Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo (2002)

Google Scholar 

Tamai, H., Toyonaga, Y., Nagasawa, Y., Hori, H., Tsumura, A., Sasaki, N., et al.: Usefulness of space saving chart type II. Japanese Orthoptic J. 29, 121–125 (2001)

Article  Google Scholar 

Tsumura, A., Sasaki, N., Fukui, C., Iwashita, K., Yuge, K., Okami, T., et al.: Clinical experience with a space-saving visual acuity test chart (SSC-330, type II). Folia Ophthalmol. Jpn. 53, 40–44 (2002)

Google Scholar 

Kucika, A., Rumjanceva, I., Patrova, T., Svede, A.: The effect of viewing distance on subjective refraction assessment. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. 70, 317–325 (2021)

Article  Google Scholar 

Mathebula, S.D., Rubin, A.: Interexaminer reproducibility for subjective refractions for an ametropic participant. BMJ Open. Ophthalmol. 7, e000954 (2022)

Sheppard, A.L., Davies, L.N.: Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 30, 143–151 (2010)

Article  Google Scholar 

Chinn, R.N., Raghuram, A., Curtiss, M.K., Gehring, A.M., De Paula, A.J., Roberts, T.L.: Repeatability of the accommodative response measured by the grand Seiko autorefractor in children with and without amblyopia and adults. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 236, 221–231 (2022)

Article  Google Scholar 

Pujol, J., Ondategui-Parra, J.C., Badiella, L., Otero, C., Vilaseca, M., Aldaba, M.: Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system. J. Optom. 10, 43–51 (2016)

Article  Google Scholar 

Bennett, A.G.: An historical review of optometric principles and techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 6, 3–21 (1986)

Article  Google Scholar 

Yi, Z., Jie, G., Kai, C., Jing, S., Wei, Z., Yun, D.: Theoretical derivation and clinical validation of the resolution limit of human eye to spherical lens change: A self-controlled study. Int. Ophthalmol. 43, 1387–1394 (2023)

Article  Google Scholar 

Li, J., Zhen, J., Xie, K., Yao, K., Liu, Z., Li, X.: The effect of 0.05D interval precise refraction on small-incision lenticule extraction surgery: A retrospective study with short-term follow-up. Clin. Optom. (Auckl). 16, 341–348 (2024)

Article  Google Scholar 

Xu, J., Jiang, J., Chen, S., Li, Z., Xiao, Y.: Enhanced visual quality with 0.05D interval subjective refraction: a self-controlled study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 66, 2114 (2025)

Google Scholar 

Duan, Z., Tang, N., Wang, Y.: Comparison of dynamic visual acuity in spectacles prescribed to 0.05D versus 0.25D steps: a self-control, randomized study. Photonics. 12, 692 (2025)

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif