Lee PH, Ahn JM, Chang M et al (2016) Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Secular Trends in Patient Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(11):1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.089
Wee SB, Ahn JM, Kang DY, Park SJ, Park DW (2024) Contemporary State-of-the-Art PCI of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 17(11):e014026. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014026Epub 2024 Nov 19. PMID: 39561238
Park DY, An S, Jolly N et al (2022) Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing bifurcation techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025394
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghafari C, Carlier S (2021) Stent visualization methods to guide percutaneous coronary interventions and assess long-term patency. World J Cardiol 13(9):416–437. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v13.i9.416
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L (2007) Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(8):839–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.055
Sarwar M, Adedokun S, Narayanan MA (2024) Role of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in intracoronary imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol 21(1):104–129. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.001
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kubo T, Terada K, Ino Y et al (2022) Combined use of multiple intravascular imaging techniques in acute coronary syndrome. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:824128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.824128
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Zandvoort LJC, Tovar Forero MN, Masdjedi K et al (2019) References for left main stem dimensions: a cross sectional intravascular ultrasound analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93(2):233–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27826
Reig J, Petit M (2004) Main trunk of the left coronary artery: anatomic study of the parameters of clinical interest. Clin Anat 17(1):6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10162
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S et al (2021) 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 79(2):e21–e129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006
Javed S, Mei Y, Zhang Y, Liu C, Liu S (2023) Multi-slice CT analysis of the length of left main coronary artery: its relation to sex, age, diameter and branching pattern of left main coronary artery, and coronary dominance. Surg Radiol Anat 45(8):1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03193-w
Al-Omari IL, Shatarat AT, Bani-Hani AM, Hadidi MT, Al-Makhamreh HK (2025) The impact of age, sex and coronary dominance on the morphological characteristics of the left main coronary artery in Jordanian population. Int J Morphol 43(1):335–343. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022025000100335
Mutlu D, Ser OS, Strepkos D et al (2025) Impact of bifurcation angle on side branch occlusion in provisional bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry. Am J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.05.033
Murasato Y, Meno K, Mori T, Tanenaka K (2022) Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and clinical outcome of coronary bifurcation intervention-a scoping review. PLoS One 2022(8):e0273157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273157
Zhang D, Xu B, Yin D et al (2015) How bifurcation angle impacts the fate of side branch after main vessel stenting: a retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25858
Pagiatakis C, Tardif JC, L’Allier PL, Mongrain R (2017) Effect of stenosis eccentricity on the functionality of coronary bifurcation lesions-a numerical study. Med Biol Eng Comput 55(12):2079–2095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1653-7
Yakushiji T, Maehara A, Mintz GS et al (2013) An intravascular ultrasound comparison of left anterior descending artery/first diagonal branch versus distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention 8(9):1040–1046. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV8I9A160
Louvard Y, Medina A (2015) Definitions and classifications of bifurcation lesions and treatment. EuroIntervention 11(V):V23–V26. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv11sva5
Riley RF, Henry TD, Mahmud E et al (2020) SCAI position statement on optimal percutaneous coronary interventional therapy for complex coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(2):346–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28994
Papadopoulou SL, Girasis C, Gijsen FJ et al (2014) A CT-based Medina classification in coronary bifurcations: does the lumen assessment provide sufficient information? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84(3):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25496
Truesdell AG, Alasnag MA, Kaul P et al (2023) Intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 81(6):590–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.045
Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y et al (2017) Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(21):2605–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066(DK CRUSH)
Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW et al (2016) Everolimus-Eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 375(23):2223–2235. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610227
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J et al (2018) Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ULTIMATE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(24):3126–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013
Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P et al (2016) Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10060):2618–2628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5
Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T et al (2017) Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J 38(42):3139–3147. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J et al (2013) Oct compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(10):1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.014
Mézquita AJV, Biavati F, Falk V et al (2023) Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a consensus statement from the quantitative cardiovascular imaging study group. Nat Rev Cardiol 20(10):696–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-023-00880-4
Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122(6):603–613. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.915009
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maaniitty T, Stenström I, Bax JJ et al (2017) Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography with selective PET perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(11):1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.025
Otake H, Kubo T, Hibi K et al (2024) Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial. EuroIntervention 20(17):e1086-e1097. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00314
Comments (0)