Background Heterozygous c.283+1G>A and c.283G>A variants in the THRB gene, encoding for thyroid hormone receptor (TR)β1 and β2, lead to autosomal dominant macular dystrophy (ADMD). We report the detailed clinical characterization of two first-degree relatives with ADMD, heterozygous for THRB c.283+1G>A, and an unrelated ADMD patient with a novel variant, c.283G>C. The genomic and molecular consequences of both variants were studied.
Methods gDNA and mRNA were obtained from leukocytes. Clinical characterization included biochemistry, bone density and body composition, ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound, audiometry and color-vision. In vitro assays investigated TR function and DNA binding.
Results The patients manifested no resistance to thyroid hormone beta (RTHβ) and had normal FT4 and TSH. Detailed studies in two patients showed no goiter, tachycardia, hypercholesterinemia or hepatic steatosis. Hearing was not impaired. Both had impaired color vision and reduced bone density. RT-PCR from all three patients revealed skipping of exon 4 exclusive to TRβ1, producing a deletion of 87 amino acids in the N-terminal domain (TRβ1ΔNTD). In vitro, DNA-binding affinity of TRβ1ΔNTD to DR4-TRE with or without RXRα was comparable to TRβ1WT. Surprisingly, TRβ1ΔNTD was transcriptionally twice more active than TRβ1WT with a similar EC50 for T3, demonstrating gain-of-function of TRβ1ΔNTD. THRA expression in leukocytes was increased by 3-fold compared to unrelated controls and different from RTHβ patients.
Conclusion These THRB splice site variants produce TRβ1 exon 4 skipping, resulting in a gain-of-function mutant, TRβ1ΔNTD. This explains the dominant ADMD phenotype devoid of RTHβ and suggests a TRβ1 gain-of-function syndrome.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementD.F., L.C.M. and G.S.H. were supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (424957847-TRR 296 LOCOTACT, HO 7114/1-1). S.R. and A.M.D. were supported in part by grant DK015070 from the National Institutes of Health (USA).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Chicago gave ethical approval for this work (10-696-B) and the Ethics Committee of the University of Duisburg-Essen waived ethical approval for this work (25-12872-BO).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)