Background Accelerated biological aging (BioAgeAccel) has been implicated in type II diabetes (T2D) mellitus development; however, its dynamic changes and their links to T2D incidence, mortality and glycemic traits remain unclear.
Methods Leveraging repeated measures from the UK Biobank, we first calculated two BioAgeAccel metrics (KDMAccel and PhenoAgeAccel) and derived three burdens (slope, cumulative, and relative cumulative change). We then assessed associations of BioAgeAccel transitions and these burdens with incident T2D and mortality. Secondary analyses extended the two primary outcomes by incorporating glucose, HbA1c, and six IR surrogates, which were also evaluated as potential mediators.
Results Among 13,751 included participants, 412 (3.0%) new T2D cases and 609 (4.4%) all-cause deaths were identified within a median follow-up of 9.5 years. Dynamic transition from non-accelerated to accelerated aging was markedly related to elevated T2D risk (KDMAccel: HR=1.65 [1.24∼2.20]; PhenoAgeAccel: HR=1.50 [1.12∼2.00]) and all-cause mortality risk (KDMAccel: HR=1.32 [1.06∼1.64]; PhenoAgeAccel: HR=2.17 [1.73∼2.71]). BioAgeAccel burdens demonstrated dose-response effects, with cumulative BioAgeAccel showing the greatest influence on T2D (KDMAccel: HR=1.25 [1.03∼1.51]; PhenoAgeAccel: HR=1.26 [1.06∼1.49]) and all-cause mortality (KDMAccel: HR=1.25 [1.07∼1.47]; PhenoAgeAccel: HR=1.51 [1.31∼1.74]). Similar association patterns were observed for all the eight glycemic traits. Mediation analyses revealed that these glycemic traits on average mediated 19∼32% of the KDMAccel burden-T2D effect and 16∼24% of the PhenoAgeAccel burden-T2D effect. Incorporating BioAgeAccel burden into FINDRISC significantly enhanced prediction accuracy, reaching up to 10.9% improvement in some specific aging transition statuses.
Conclusion Dynamic biological aging trajectories and BioAgeAccel burdens are independently related to elevated risks of T2D and all-cause mortality, partly via glycemic dysregulation, highlighting biological aging as a potential intervention target.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThe research of Ping Zeng was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173630 and 81402765), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20241952), the QingLan Research Project of Jiangsu Province for Young and Middle-aged Academic Leaders, the Six-Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province of China (WSN-087), and the Training Project for Youth Teams of Science and Technology Innovation at Xuzhou Medical University (TD202008). The research of Yu Yan was supported by the Students' Research and Innovation Project of National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Basic Medicine at Xuzhou Medical University (2024BMS26).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank had approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) as a Research Tissue Bank (RTB) approval. All participants provided written informed consent before enrolment in the study, which was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This approval means that researchers do not require separate ethical clearance and can operate under the RTB approval.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availabilityAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. This study used the UK Biobank resource with the application ID 88159. Researchers can access to the UK Biobank by submitting an application to the UK Biobank official website (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).
Comments (0)