Background Gastric cancer surveillance in CDH1 pathogenic variant carriers is challenging, as predictors of localized (stage T1a) and advanced (stage >T1a) signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) are not well defined. We established the Group of investigAtors STriving toward Research In CDH1 (GASTRIC) consortium to identify clinicopathological factors associated with localized and advanced SRCC.
Methods A retrospective observational study (1998–2025) of CDH1 carriers across twelve academic centers was performed. Clinical, endoscopic, and pathological data were compared between carriers with and without SRCC on endoscopy, and between those with advanced versus localized or no cancer on gastrectomy specimens.
Results Overall, 390 CDH1 carriers from 235 families were included. Presence of SRCCs on endoscopy was significantly associated with thickened folds, nodularity, masses, and intestinal metaplasia, while gastritis was negatively associated. Of 196 carriers (52.4%) undergoing gastrectomy, 11 (5.6%) had advanced cancers, 10(90.9%) of which showed endoscopic abnormalities. Identification of SRCC on baseline endoscopy was the most sensitive feature for advanced disease (0.81) but had moderate specificity (0.74), whereas masses and thickened folds were highly specific (0.99 and 0.96, respectively) but less sensitive. Negative predictive values were high (0.94-1.0), while positive predictive values were modest (0.13-0.66). On multivariate analysis, masses and SRCC foci on baseline endoscopy were independent predictors of advanced disease.
Conclusion Among CDH1 carriers, absence of endoscopic findings was reassuring, whereas significance of detected endoscopic and pathological abnormalities was less certain. Advanced cancer occurred in a small number of carriers, with endoscopic abnormalities in nearly all cases. Endoscopic surveillance might be an alternative to surgery in carriers without worrisome mucosal findings.
Background Predictors of advanced stage disease in CDH1 carriers, which could help in risk stratification and management of these individuals, are not well defined. Identifying associated features could improve risk stratification and management.
Findings Endoscopic and histologic features associated with advanced disease showed variable sensitivity and specificity. Absence of abnormalities had high negative predictive value, whereas presence of findings had limited ability to reliably predict advanced disease.
Implications for Patient Care Absence of worrisome findings is reassuring and may support continued surveillance. Detected abnormalities warrant close evaluation and discussion of surgery, though their presence alsone does not reliably indicate advanced disease.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis research received no external funding.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all centers: University of Chicago, Sinai Health System, University of Pennsylvania, University of Michigan, The Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Colorado, University of Kansas, Yale University, Fox Chase Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco and Columbia University.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data sharingData from this study can be requested from OG. Data access requires an approved proposal detailing intended use and a signed data-sharing agreement. Data will be available from publication, and no time limit applies to data availability.
AbbreviationsEGDesophagogastroduodenoscopyGEEGeneralized estimating equationIGCLCInternational Gastric Cancer Linkage ConsortiumIQRinterquartile range)NCCNNational Comprehensive Cancer Network)NEDno evidence of diseasePPIproton pump inhibitorSDstandard deviationSRCCsignet ring cell carcinomaTGtotal gastrectomy
Comments (0)