The postpartum period involves profound physical, emotional, and social changes, yet many women report fragmented, infant-centered care that leaves their own needs insufficiently addressed. Digital health tools, including mobile apps, wearables, telehealth, and online resources, are increasingly used by postpartum women to seek information, support, and reassurance; however, little is known about how women experience these tools in their everyday lives. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to explore the perspectives of postpartum women on digital health. Postpartum women (≤12 months after birth) living in Alberta, Canada, were recruited through maternity clinics and targeted social media advertisements. Four virtual focus groups (4-6 participants in each; 18 participants overall) were conducted via Zoom using a semi-structured guide on postpartum healthcare experiences, use of digital tools (apps, wearables, telehealth, AI), and perceived barriers and facilitators to adoption. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by multiple researchers.

Thematic analysis identified 32 codes, organized into 12 subthemes and four overarching themes: navigating postpartum support networks; empowerment through digital health tools; conditions for acceptable digital health design; and when technology feels like a burden. Women appreciated multiple sources of support from midwives, public health nurses, peers, and online communities, but described care that quickly became infant-focused, leaving their own recovery and mental health under-addressed, particularly in rural settings. Digital tools helped mothers structure infant and self-care, track symptoms, and prepare for appointments, yet also created new forms of burden, including information overload, usability challenges, privacy concerns, and feelings of surveillance or pressure to perform. Participants emphasized personalization (flexible notifications, mother-focused content), embedded mental health support, integration with trusted providers, and co-designed, credible platforms endorsed by Canadian health systems. Overall, to be acceptable and effective, tools must center mothers’ needs and be embedded within a broader ecosystem of responsive, continuous care.

Author summary Becoming a parent is a major life change, and many women feel that support from the health system drops off once the baby is born. At the same time, new mothers are increasingly turning to mobile phone apps, wearable devices, online groups, and video visits to answer questions, track health, and feel less alone. We wanted to understand women lived experience with these digital tools after giving birth: what feels helpful, what feels burdensome, and what they would want in an ideal tool.

Our research team, consisting of three PhD students, held four online focus group discussions (4-6 participants per group; 18 participants overall) with women in Alberta, Canada, who had given birth within the past year. They described digital tools as both empowering and exhausting. Apps and wearables helped them track feeding, sleep, and symptoms, organize daily life, and come better prepared for medical appointments. At the same time, constant tracking, frequent notifications, and unclear data practices could feel overwhelming, guilt-inducing, or intrusive.

This study is an important first step in a larger co-design work. By listening closely to mothers’ stories, we gathered practical ideas about what a supportive postpartum app should (and should not) do. In future phases, we plan to work directly with postpartum women and frontline clinicians to turn these ideas into a user-friendly, trustworthy digital tool that supports both mothers’ and babies’ health.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Yes

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Alberta Health Research Ethics Board (Pro00147501). All participants provided written informed consent prior to taking part in the focus groups. All procedures followed relevant institutional and national ethical guidelines for research involving human participants.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.