Purpose This research sought to develop a low-cognitive-load speech-in-noise test based on consonant confusions with the potential for assessing hearing-aid benefit.

Methods Vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) stimuli with added speech-shaped noise were presented as a closed-set consonant identification task. Initially, consonant-confusion matrices were used to select, from a larger set of consonants and vowel contexts, a set of ten consonants and associated signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) that were sensitive to hearing loss. The sensitivity of the qVCV test to hearing loss was validated by comparing predicted pure-tone average (PTA) hearing thresholds with their audiometric PTA. Clinical viability of the qVCV test was assessed by comparisons to the QuickSIN test. Hearing-aid benefit was assessed by comparing test scores in unaided and aided conditions.

Results The consonants most sensitive to hearing loss were /b d g t k v z s ʃ n/ in the vowel context /ɑ/. A cross-validated prediction of PTA had a mean-absolute error of 5.7 dB. The repeatability of qVCV at 50 trials was equivalent to the QuickSIN average of two lists. Hearing-aid benefit was quantified as a decibel reduction in hearing loss.

Conclusions qVCV and QuickSIN performed similarly when test times are equated. The advantages of qVCV include lower cognitive demand, fewer learning effects, and automated scoring. PTA predicted by qVCV which greatly exceeds audiometric PTA may indicate either cognitive deficits or cochlear neural degeneration. The qVCV quantification of hearing-aid benefit may have clinical value.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

National Institutes of Health

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The BTNRH Institutional Review Board approved all research protocols before recruitment, consent, screening, and data collection.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors