Automatic versus Manual Suturing in Total Laryngectomy: Fistula Incidence, Margin Status, and Operative Time

 SFX Search Permissions and Reprints(opens in new window) Article preview thumbnailAbstract Introduction

Pharyngeal reconstruction is essential after total laryngectomy. Traditionally, manual suturing (MS) is used, but it often involves longer operative times and variable outcomes. Over the years, automatic suturing (AS) has gained attention due to its precision, shorter operative time, and lower complication rates.

Objective

To compare AS and MS in patients with laryngeal carcinoma who underwent total laryngectomy, focusing on pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) incidence, operative time, surgical margins, and hospital stay.

Methods

A retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2024 at a tertiary center, including 107 patients with laryngeal carcinoma who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction with AS or MS. The suturing choice depended on oncological safety and surgeon preference. Data on demographics, tumor stage, PCF occurrence, hospital stay, and operative time were collected.

Results

A total of 53 patients underwent AS, and 54, MS. Most were male subjects (96.2%), with similar ages (63.3 versus 62.3 years; p = 0.559). The PCF rates were higher with AS (26.4 versus 18.5%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.328). No correlation was found between salvage laryngectomy and PCF. Negative margins (R0) were more frequently observed in the AS group (82.1 versus 37%; p = 0.04). Operative time was shorter in AS (316.8 versus 367.2 minutes; p = 0.01). Hospital stay and time to oral feeding were similar.

Conclusion

There was a noted association between AS and shorter operative time and a higher observed rate of negative margins in selected cases, without an increase in PCF. These findings should be interpreted in the context of selection bias and anatomical constraints.

Keywords total laryngectomy - pharyngocutaneous fistula - automatic suturing; manual suturing - laryngeal carcinoma - pharyngeal reconstruction Data Availability

Data will be available upon request to the corresponding author.


Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI) to assist with language refinement, grammar correction, and structural clarity. The authors critically reviewed and edited all content to ensure accuracy and intellectual integrity. The use of AI did not replace any author's contribution, and all authors take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.


Editor-in-Chief: Geraldo Pereira Jotz.

Publication History

Received: 04 September 2025

Accepted: 18 November 2025

Article published online:
30 April 2026

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil

Bibliographical Record
José Alberto Fernandes, António Andrade, Pedro Valente, Ricardo Vaz, Diogo Pereira, Helena Silveira. Automatic versus Manual Suturing in Total Laryngectomy: Fistula Incidence, Margin Status, and Operative Time. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2026; 30: s00461819643.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0046-1819643

Comments (0)

No login
gif