Aim Cystic fibrosis (CF) care has been transformed by CFTR modulator therapies, yet most efficacy data arise from clinical trials with restrictive eligibility criteria. Real-world registry data can capture treatment outcomes in broader, more diverse patient populations. We used the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data to evaluate longitudinal clinical outcomes, and care benchmarking at a single Adult CF Program Center over a decade.
Methods A retrospective, descriptive analysis of CFFPR data (2011–2022) was performed to assess trends in modulator use, lung function (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI), respiratory microbiology, and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) methods were applied to compare outcomes across peak modulator eras: pre-modulator (2011), ivacaftor (2015), mixed-modulator (2019), and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELE/TEZ/IVA) (2021). Program-level outcomes were benchmarked against national network metrics to assess adherence to guideline-based care.
Results Over ten years, median ppFEV1 improved from 63.4% (2011) to 78.8% (2021), and BMI increased from 22.3 to 24.8 kg/m2. The proportion of adults experiencing more than one PEx annually declined from 39.7% to 19.5%, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.a.) culture positivity decreased from 79% to 47%. ELE/TEZ/IVA therapy was associated with greatest clinical improvements. Program-level performance remained comparable to national network benchmarks, reflecting high adherence to standard care metrics.
Conclusion Registry-based CER provides valuable real-world insights into CF care effectiveness and quality improvement. This decade-long analysis demonstrates significant clinical gains associated with modulator therapies and highlights the importance of patient registries in monitoring outcomes, benchmarking care, and informing global CF care models and standards for rare disease management.
Key Messages
□ Real-world registry data enables decade-long evaluation of CFTR modulator effectiveness.
□ Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor demonstrates the greatest clinical benefit among modulator therapies.
□ Benchmarking Adult CF Program performance against the Network of Adult CF Programs facilitates quality improvement and standard care guideline adherence.
□ Patient registries provide insights for personalized care, program-level decision-making, and international standards for rare disease management.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Augusta University - Institutional Review Board under the Research-Not Human Subject Research regulation.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and the references for CF Patient Registry Program Specific Reports.
Comments (0)