Amir, O., & Levav, J. (2008). Choice construction versus preference construction: The instability of preferences learned in context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.2.145

Article  Google Scholar 

Association of Shelter Veterinarians. (2022). The guidelines for standards of care in animal shelters: Second edition. Journal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health, 1(S1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.56771/ASVguidelines.2022

Article  Google Scholar 

Bateson, M. (2004). Mechanisms of decision-making and the interpretation of choice tests. Animal Welfare, 13(S1), S115–S120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600014457

Article  Google Scholar 

Blackett, T. A., McKenna, C., Kavanagh, L., & Morgan, D. R. (2017). The welfare of wild animals in zoological institutions: Are we meeting our duty of care? International Zoo Yearbook, 51(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/izy.12143

Article  Google Scholar 

Bradshaw, J. W. S., Healey, L. M., Thorne, C. J., Macdonald, D. W., & Arden-Clark, C. (2000). Differences in food preferences between individuals and populations of domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 68(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00102-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cameron, K. E., Siddall, A., & Bizo, L. A. (2021). Comparison of paired- and multiple-stimulus preference assessments using a runway task by dogs. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 34. https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2021.34.01.01

Catania, A. C. (1975). Freedom and knowledge: An experimental analysis of preference in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1975.24-89

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Catania, A. C. (2013). A natural science of behavior. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032928

Article  Google Scholar 

Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1980). Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dawkins, M. (1977). Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preferences and welfare. Animal Behaviour, 25, 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90096-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Dawkins, M. (2004). Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 13(S1), S3–S7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600014317

Dawkins, M. S. (2021). The science of animal welfare: Understanding what animals want. Oxford University Press.

Duncan, I. J. H. (1978). The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology, 4(3), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(78)90007-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Englund, M. D., & Cronin, K. A. (2023). Choice, control, and animal welfare: Definitions and essential inquiries to advance animal welfare science. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1156428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1156428

Article  Google Scholar 

Fernandez, E. J., Dorey, N. R., & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (2004). A two-choice preference assessment with five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 7(3), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0703_3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fernandes, A. J. B., Campos, F. da S. F., Oliveira, G. S., Oliveira, P. C., Borges, D. A., Pedrosa, I. de A., & Scott, F. B. (2024). Environmental enrichment interaction for laboratory beagle dogs used in research. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 46, e006323. https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm006323

Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2015). Shut up and pet me! Domestic dogs prefer petting to vocal praise. Behavioural Processes, 110, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.019

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

GraphPad Software, Inc. (2025). GraphPad Prism (Version 10.2.3) [Computer software]. GraphPad Software, Inc.

Grigg, E. K., Pick, L., & Nibblett, B. (2013). Litter box preference in domestic cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 15(4), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X12460658

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guy, N. C., Hopson, M., & Vanderstichel, R. (2014). Litterbox size preference in domestic cats. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(2), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.12.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kang, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Falcomata, T. S., Sigafoos, J., & Xu, Z. (2013). Comparison of preference assessment procedures: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.028

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kry, K., & Casey, R. (2007). The effect of hiding enrichment on stress levels and behaviour of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) in a shelter setting and the implications for adoption potential. Animal Welfare, 16, 375–383.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lockhart, K. A. (1979). Behavioral assessment of human preference. The Behavior Analyst, 2(2), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391840

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maier, M. J. (2021). DirichletReg: Dirichlet Regression. R package version 0.7-1. https://github.com/maiermarco/DirichletReg

Martin, A. L., Franklin, A. N., Perlman, J. E., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (2018). Assessment of food item preference in rhesus macaques. Behavioural Processes, 157, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.05.003

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Martin, T. L., Yu, C. T., Martin, G. L., & Fazzio, D. (2006). On choice, preference, and preference for choice. The Behavior Analyst Today, 7(2), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100088

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mason, G. J., & Bateson, M. (2009). Motivation and the organization of behaviour. In P. Jensen (Ed.), The ethology of domestic animals: An introductory text (2nd ed., pp. 38–56). CAB International.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Mason, G., Cooper, J., & Garner, J. (1997). Models of motivational decision-making and how they affect the experimental assessment of motivational priorities. BSAP Occasional Publication, 20, 9–17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mehrkam, L. R., & Dorey, N. R. (2015). Preference assessments in the zoo. Zoo Biology, 34(5), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21232

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Noldus Information Technology. (2011). The Observer XT [Computer software]. Noldus Information Technology.

Pekel, A. Y., Mülazımoğlu, S. B., & Acar, N. (2020). Taste preferences in cats. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 48(1), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1786391

Article  Google Scholar 

Platzer, J. M., & Feuerbacher, E. N. (2022). Reinforcer efficacy of grain for horses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 118(2), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.797

Prescott, M. J., & Lidster, K. (2017). Improving quality of science through better animal welfare. Lab Animal, 46, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1217

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Google Scholar 

Rochlitz, I. (2005). A review of the housing requirements of domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) kept in the home. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 93, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.01.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Salaun, F., Blanchard, G., Le Paih, L., Roberti, F., & Niceron, C. (2017). Impact of macronutrient composition and palatability in wet diets on food selection in cats. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 101, 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12564

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tanaka, A., Wagner, D. C., Kass, P. H., & Hurley, K. F. (2012). Associations among weight loss, stress, and upper respiratory tract infection in shelter cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 240(5), 570–576. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.240.5.570

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thompson, H., Riemer, S., Ellis, S. L. H., & Burman, O. H. P. (2016). Behaviour directed towards inaccessible food predicts consumption: A novel way of assessing food preference. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 180, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Tobie, C., Péron, F., & Larose, C. (2015). Assessing food preferences in dogs and cats. Animals, 5(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5010126

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central