Lateral lumbar interbody fusion to address pseudarthrosis after prior posterior spinal instrumentation

Cassinelli EH, Wallach C, Hanscom B, Vogt M, Kang JD (2006) Prospective clinical outcomes of revision fusion surgery in patients with pseudarthrosis after posterior lumbar interbody fusions using stand-alone metallic cages. Spine J 6(4):428–434

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Derman PB, Singh K (2020) Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Lumbar Pseudarthrosis in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Literature Review and Case Study. Hss j 16(2):183–187

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shahzad H, Ahmad M, Singh VK, Bhatti N, Yu E, Phillips FM et al (2024) Predictive factors of symptomatic lumbar pseudoarthrosis following multilevel primary lumbar fusion. N Am Spine Soc J 17:100302

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kalavacherla S, Stone LE, McCann CP, Saripella M, Pham MH (2024) A systematic review of pseudarthrosis and reoperation rates in minimally invasive adult spinal deformity correction. World Neurosurg X 22:100282

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burkhard MD, Guven AE, Demopoulos B, Ortiz S, Stepan T, Mielke AM et al (2026) 3D-Printed Titanium: Game-Changer for Standalone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An Analysis of Risk Factors for Revision Surgery. Global Spine J 16(3):1515–1524

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adl Amini D, Moser M, Oezel L, Shue J, Pumberger M, Sama AA et al (2022) Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spine Surg 8(3):323–332

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Montenegro TS, Gonzalez GA, Saiegh FA, Philipp L, Hines K, Hattar E et al (2021) Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: an observational cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine 35(4):437–445

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahamid A, Jayyusi F, Hodruj M, Mansour A, Fishman D, Behrbalk E (2025) Comparative Analysis of Primary and Revision Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgeries: Predictors, Outcomes, and Clinical Implications Using Big Data. J Clin Med 14(3):723

Suh SP, Jo YH, Jeong HW, Choi WR, Kang CN (2017) Outcomes of Revision Surgery Following Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between Pseudarthrosis and Adjacent Segment Disease. Asian Spine J 11(3):463–471

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Albert TJ, Pinto M, Denis F (2000) Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Pseudarthrosis With Anteroposterior Fusion: A Functional and Radiographic Outcome Study. Spine 25(1):123-9

Owens RK, Djurasovic M, Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY (2016) Impact of Surgical Approach on Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Lumbar Pseudarthrosis. Global Spine J 6(8):786–791

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee YC, Lee R (2019) Minimal invasive surgical algorithm for revision lumbar spinal surgery. J Spine Surg 5(4):413–424

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burkhard MD, Calek AK, Fasser MR, Cornaz F, Widmer J, Spirig JM et al (2023) Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation. Eur Spine J 32(6):1876–1886

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6(4):435–443

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yingsakmongkol W, Jitpakdee K, Varakornpipat P, Choentrakool C, Tanasansomboon T, Limthongkul W et al (2022) Clinical and Radiographic Comparisons among Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison with Three-Way Matching. Asian Spine J 16(5):712–722

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang L, Liu L, Dong L, Xu Z, Zhang X, Qian L (2024) Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25(1):108

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manzur MK, Steinhaus ME, Virk SS, Jivanelli B, Vaishnav AS, McAnany SJ et al (2020) Fusion rate for stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Spine J 20(11):1816–1825

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watkins RIV, Watkins R III, Hanna R (2014) Non-Union Rate With Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Medicine 93(29):e275

Burkhard MD, Stepan T, Jones C, Lama J, Mjaess N, (2026) Guven AE et al Standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces the risk of adjacent segment surgery. Spine J (2):301–309

Article  Google Scholar 

World Medical Association Declaration (2013) of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20):2191–2194

Article  Google Scholar 

Cuschieri S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl 1):S31–s4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K (1995) Anterior Fresh Frozen Structural Allografts in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: Do They Work If Combined With Posterior Fusion and Instrumentation in Adult Patients With Kyphosis or Anterior Column. Defects? Spine 20(12): 1410-8

Vargas-Soto HA, Mehbod A, Mullaney KJ, Dykes D, Schwender J, Transfeldt E et al (2009) Salvage procedures for pseudarthrosis after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)-anterior-only versus anterior-posterior surgery: a clinical and radiological outcome study. J Surg Orthop Adv 18(4):200–204

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lambrechts MJ, Toci GR, Siegel N, Karamian BA, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS et al (2023) Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions. Spine J 23(1):105–115

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burkhard MD, Loretz R, Uçkay I, Bauer DE, Betz M, Farshad M (2021) Occult infection in pseudarthrosis revision after spinal fusion. Spine J 21(3):370–376

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Loggia G, Farshad M, Jokeit M, Widmer J, Dossi S, Burkhard MD (2025) Impact of spinal alignment on adjacent segment disease and degeneration after short-segment lumbosacral fusion. Spine J 25(11):2461–2474

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ohba T, Ebata S, Oba H, Koyama K, Haro H (2019) Risk Factors for Clinically Relevant Loosening of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws. Spine Surg Relat Res 3(1):79–85

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steinhaus ME, Salzmann SN, Lovecchio F, Shifflett GD, Yang J, Kueper J et al (2019) Risk Factors for Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(3):177–184

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prinz V, Bayerl S, Renz N, Trampuz A, Czabanka M, Woitzik J et al (2019) High frequency of low-virulent microorganisms detected by sonication of pedicle screws: a potential cause for implant failure. J Neurosurgery: Spine SPI 31(3):424–429

Google Scholar 

Wazen RM, Currey JA, Guo H, Brunski JB, Helms JA, Nanci A (2013) Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces. Acta Biomater 9(5):6663–6674

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L (2018) Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol 16(7):397–409

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif