Qian S, et al. Developing cardiac digital twin populations powered by machine learning provides electrophysiological insights in conduction and repolarization. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2025;4(5):624–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-025-00650-0.
Koopsen T, et al. Virtual pacing of a patient’s digital twin to predict left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2024;26(1):euae009. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae009.
Gillette K, et al. A personalized real-time virtual model of whole heart electrophysiology. Front Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.907190.
Zou H, Zheng X, Wu L, Zhang S, Chang P, Chen Y. Digital twins in cardiovascular disease: a scoping review. Int J Med Inf. 2026;206:106138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106138.
Bozkurt S, Paracha W, Bakaya K, Schievano S. Patient-specific modelling and parameter optimisation to simulate dilated cardiomyopathy in children. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022;13(5):712–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-022-00611-9.
Mineroff J, McCulloch AD, Krummen D, Ganapathysubramanian B, Krishnamurthy A. Optimization framework for patient-specific cardiac modeling. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019;10(4):553–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00428-z.
Menon K, et al. Personalized coronary and myocardial blood flow models incorporating CT perfusion imaging and synthetic vascular trees. npj Imaging. 2024;2(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44303-024-00014-6.
Thangaraj PM, Benson SH, Oikonomou EK, Asselbergs FW, Khera R. Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(45):4808–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae619.
Fois M, Maule SV, Giudici M, Valente M, Ridolfi L, Scarsoglio S. Cardiovascular response to posture changes: multiscale modeling and in vivo validation during head-up tilt. Front Physiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.826989.
Heldt T, Shim EB, Kamm RD, Mark RG. Computational modeling of cardiovascular response to orthostatic stress. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(3):1239–54. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00241.2001.
Lim E, et al. A cardiovascular mathematical model of graded head-up tilt. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077357.
Whittle RS, Diaz-Artiles A. Modeling individual differences in cardiovascular response to gravitational stress using a sensitivity analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2021;130(6):1983–2001. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00727.2020.
Uchida K, Nishihara K, Shirakawa S. CMA-ES with Adaptive Reevaluation for Multiplicative Noise,” May 19, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2405.11471. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.11471.
Olinic D, et al. “Arterial compliance in hypertension and heart failure”, Romanian. J Intern Med Rev Roum Med Interne. 2003;41(2):113–24.
Pagoulatou S, et al. In vivo application and validation of a novel noninvasive method to estimate the end-systolic elastance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021;320(4):H1554–64. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00703.2020.
Sahoo KP, Patra A, Ghosh N, Pal A, Sinha A, Khandelwal S. A Lumped Parameter Model for Cardiac Output Estimation Using Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform. In 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), 2021 (pp. 5523–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629803.
Davis TL. Teaching physiology through interactive simulation of hemodynamics. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991. Accessed: Jan. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/13823.
de Boer RW, Karemaker JM, Strackee J. Hemodynamic fluctuations and baroreflex sensitivity in humans: a beat-to-beat model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1987;253(3):H680–9. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.3.H680.
Goldberger AL, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet. Circulation. 2000;101(23):e215–20. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.23.e215.
Heldt T, Oefinger MB, Hoshiyama M, Mark RG. Circulatory response to passive and active changes in posture, In Computers in Cardiology, 2003 (pp. 263–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2003.1291141.
Zong W, Heldt T, Moody GB, Mark RG. An open-source algorithm to detect onset of arterial blood pressure pulses. In Computers in Cardiology, Thessaloniki Chalkidiki, Greece: IEEE, 2003 (pp. 259–62). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2003.1291140.
Obata Y, et al. Ejection time: influence of hemodynamics and site of measurement in the arterial tree. Hypertens Res. 2017;40(9):811–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.43.
Colebank MJ, et al. Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024;327(2):H473–503. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00766.2023.
Raue A, et al. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1923–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358.
Gutenkunst RN, Waterfall JJ, Casey FP, Brown KS, Myers CR, Sethna JP. Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3(10):e189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189.
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Westerhof N, Lankhaar J-W, Westerhof BE. The arterial windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47(2):131–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0359-2.
DeMers D, Wachs D. Physiology, Mean Arterial Pressure. In StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2026. Accessed: Mar 19, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538226/
Comments (0)