Weissbart SJ, Zimmern PE, Nitti VW, Lemack GE, Kobashi KC, Vasavada SP, Wein AJ. The history of the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine, and Urogenital Reconstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:2015–25.
Caruso DJ, Kanagarajah P, Cohen BL, Ayyathurai R, Gomez C, Gousse AE. What is the predictive value of urodynamics to reproduce clinical findings of urinary frequency, urge urinary incontinence, and/or stress urinary incontinence? Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:1205–9.
Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic female volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:434–59.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Axell RG, Guzelburc V, Yasmin H, Toia B, Pakzad MH, Hamid R, Ockrim JL, Greenwell TJ (2021) Ambulatory urodynamic findings change patient outcomes. Soc Int d’Urol J. 2021;2:354–361.
Dokmeci F, Sevalm. M, Gok H. Comparison of ambulatory versus conventional urodynamics in females with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:518–21.
Cheng Y, Xu S, Chen J, Wu X, Chen Z, Du G. The influence of intubation on urinary flow parameters in pressure-flow study and its significance for urodynamic diagnosis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:3103–10.
Zhu BS, Jiang HC, Li Y. Impact of urethral catheterization on uroflow during pressure-flow study. J Int Med Res. 2016;44:1034–9.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gross MD, Frainey BT, Lyon ME, et al. Validation of a Wireless Catheter-Free Ambulatory Urodynamics Device in Women With Neurogenic Bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2026;45:96–104.
Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic. Studies - PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10679828/. Accessed 22 Mar 2026.
Kocher NJ, Damaser MS, Gill BC. Advances in Ambulatory Urodynamics. Curr Urol Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-00989-w.
Frainey BT, Majerus SJA, Derisavifard S, Lewis KC, Williams AR, Balog BM, Butler RS, Goldman HB, Damaser MS. First in Human Subjects Testing of the UroMonitor: A Catheter-free Wireless Ambulatory Bladder Pressure Monitor. J Urol. 2023;210:186–95.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim J, Xavier K, Cannon-Smith T, Vaughan T, Vemulapalli S, Zhao H, Aalami-Harandi A, Shah N. The Feasibility and Safety of the Glean Urodynamics System: The Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy Study. J Endourol. 2025;39:625–34.
Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, Goldman HB, Guralnick M, Eustice S, Dickinson T, Hashim H. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1243–60.
Nitti VW. Pressure Flow Urodynamic Studies: The Gold Standard for Diagnosing Bladder Outlet Obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7:S14.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lim CS, Abrams P. The Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol. 1995;13:34–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Suskind AM, Clemens JQ, Kaufman SR, Stoffel JT, Oldendorf A, Malaeb BS, Jandron T, Cameron AP. Patient perceptions of physical and emotional discomfort related to urodynamic testing; a questionnaire-based study in men and women with and without neurologic conditions. Urology. 2015;85:547.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gorton E, Stanton S. Women’s attitudes to urodynamics: a questionnaire survey. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:851–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Murphy A, Chen J, Christie A, Souders C, Kuhlmann P, Herforth C, Carmel M, Zimmern P, Lemack G, Goueli R, MP02-12 RISK FACTORS FOR INCOMPLETE URODYNAMIC TESTING APPOINTMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE APPOINTMENT NO-SHOWS AND LATE-CANCELLATIONS. J Urol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0001008600.97797.3b.12.
Moll FH, Halling T, Schäfer W. History of urodynamics. Its origins, development and implication for urology as a specialty in Europe and the USA. Cont Rep. 2024;12:100069.
Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, Van Kerrebroeck P. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:261–74.
Bates P, Bradley WE, Glen E, Griffiths D, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling A, Zinner N, Hald T. The Standardization of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function. J Urol. 1979;121:551–4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ellis-Jones J, Swithinbank L, Abrams P. The bridges and barriers to ‘good’ urodynamic practice: a regional perspective. Int J Urol Nurs. 2013;7:3–8.
Frenkl TL, Railkar R, Palcza J, Scott BB, Alon A, Green S, Schaefer W. Variability of urodynamic parameters in patients with overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1565–9.
Gupta A, Defreitas G, Lemack GE. The reproducibility of urodynamic findings in healthy female volunteers: Results of repeated studies in the same setting and after short-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:311–6.
Whiteside JL, Hijaz A, Imrey PB, Barber M, Paraiso M, Rackley M, Raymond R, Vasavada S, Walters M, Daneshgari F. Reliability and Agreement of Urodynamics Interpretations in a Female Pelvic Medicine Center. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:315–23.
Digesu GA, Gargasole C, Hendricken C, Gore M, Kocjancic E, Khullar V, Rosier PF. ICS teaching module: Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:364–7.
Radley SC, Rosario DJ, Chapple CR, Farkas AG. Conventional and ambulatory urodynamic findings in women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. J Urol. 2001;166:2253–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knorr JM, Werneburg GT. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Interpretation of Urodynamics. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2024;19:1–10.
Comments (0)