Keerti A, Ninave S (2022) DNA fingerprinting: use of autosomal short tandem repeats in forensic DNA typing. Cureus 14(10):e30210. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30210

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Starinsky-Elbaz S, Ram T, Voskoboinik L, Pasternak Z (2020) Weight-of-evidence for DNA identification of missing persons and human remains using CODIS. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 16(3):389–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-020-00248-x

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ge J, Budowle B (2021) Forensic investigation approaches of searching relatives in DNA databases. J Forensic Sci 66(2):430–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14615

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ram T, Starinsky-Elbaz S, Avlas O, Issan Y (2023) A new search tool for familial searches in the Israel criminal DNA database. Forensic Sci Int 346:111639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111639

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Maguire CN, McCallum LA, Storey C, Whitaker JP (2014) Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database® to identify unknown offenders via their relatives—The UK experience. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.07.004

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Myers SP, Timken MD, Piucci ML, Sims GA, Greenwald MA, Weigand JJ et al (2011) Searching for first-degree familial relationships in California’s offender DNA database: validation of a likelihood ratio-based approach. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5(5):493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.10.010

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Tuazon OM, Wickenheiser RA, Ansell R, Guerrini CJ, Zwenne GJ, Custers B (2024) Law enforcement use of genetic genealogy databases in criminal investigations: nomenclature, definition and scope. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 8:100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100460

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miller G (2010) Forensics: familial DNA testing scores a win in serial killer case. Science 329(5989):262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.262

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Issan Y, Avlas O, Daniel O (2019) Investigation of different ways in which the CODIS 7.0 may be used in mass disaster identification. J Forensic Sci 64(3):852–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13915

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greytak E, Wyatt S, Cady J, Moore CC, Armentrout S (2024) Investigative genetic genealogy for human remains identification. J Forensic Sci 69(5):1531–1545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15469

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Starinsky-Elbaz S, Ariel T, Issan Y (2019) DNA kinship analysis of unidentified human remains that led to a murder investigation. Forensic Sci Int 300:e20–e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.045

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rohlfs RV, Fullerton SM, Weir BS (2012) Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability. PLoS Genet 8(2):e1002469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Edge MD, Coop G (2019) How lucky was the genetic investigation in the Golden State Killer. case? Genet 211(3):709–720. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.301613

Article  Google Scholar 

Henn BM, Hon L, Macpherson JM, Eriksson N, Saxonov S, Pe’er I et al (2012) Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples. PLoS ONE 7(4):e34267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034267

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zlotogora J, Shalev SA (2014) A long-term follow up of premarital counseling in the Israeli Arab population. J Community Genet 5(4):377–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0192-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zaken N, Motro U, Berdugo R, Elkayam Sapir L, Zamir A (2013) Can brothers share the same STR profile? Forensic Sci Int Genet 7(5):494–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.04.011

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sharkia R, Khatib M, Sheikh-Muhammad A, Mahajnah M, Zalan A (2023) The prevailing trend of consanguinity in the Arab society of Israel: is it still a challenge? J Biosoc Sci 55(1):169–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932021000675

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vardi-Saliternik R, Friedlander Y, Cohen T (2002) Consanguinity in a population sample of Israeli Muslim Arabs, Christian Arabs and Druze. Ann Hum Biol 29(4):422–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460110100928

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Tamura T, Osawa M, Ochiai E, Suzuki T, Nakamura T (2015) Evaluation of advanced multiplex short tandem repeat systems in pairwise kinship analysis. Legal Med (Tokyo) 17(5):320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.03.005

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Reid TM, Baird ML, Reid JP, Lee SC, Lee RF (2008) Use of sibling pairs to determine the familial searching efficiency of forensic databases. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2(4):340–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.04.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

RTI International (2015) Familial DNA searching: current approaches. Final report. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. NCJ 248665

Google Scholar 

Gopinath S, Zhong C, Nguyen V, Ge J, Lagacé RE, Short ML et al (2016) Developmental validation of the Yfiler® Plus PCR amplification kit: an enhanced Y-STR multiplex for casework and database applications. Forensic Sci Int Genet 24:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.006

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cavalcanti P, Nogueira TLS, Carvalho EFD, Silva DAD (2024) Forensic use of human mitochondrial DNA: a review. Acad Bras Cienc 96(4):e20231179. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420231179

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Karantzali E, Rosmaraki P, Kotsakis A, Le Roux-Le Pajolec MG, Fitsialos G (2019) The effect of FBI CODIS core STR loci expansion on familial DNA database searching. Forensic Sci Int Genet 43:102129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.07.008

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kong QQ, Chen LQ, Li CT, Liu XL (2022) Efficiency analysis of uncle-nephew relationship identification by increasing STR markers and adding reference samples. Fa yi xue za zhi 38(3):360–366. https://doi.org/10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2022.520407

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raziel A, Oz C, Dell’Ariccia Carmon A, Ilsar R, Zamir A (2012) Discordance at D3S1358 locus involving SGM Plus™ and the European new generation multiplex kits. Forensic Sci Int Genet 6(1):108–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.03.010

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zhong C, Green R, Norona W et al (2019) Applied Biosystems VeriFiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit with internal quality control system provides confident answers with challenging forensic samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 7(1):441–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.044

Article  Google Scholar 

Promega Corporation, PowerPlex®, ESI 16 Fast System for use on the Applied Biosystems® Genetic Analyzers: technical manual TMD044 [Internet]. Madison (WI): Promega Corporation; [cited 2026 Aug 17]. Available from: https://worldwide.promega.com/resources/protocols/technical-manuals/d0/powerplex-esi-16-fast-system-for-use-on-the-applied-biosystems-genetic-analyzers-protocol/

Thermo Fisher Scientific Yfiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit [Internet]. Waltham (MA): Thermo Fisher Scientific; cited 2026 Mar 12. Available from: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/4482730

Pickrahn I, Müller E, Zahrer W, Dunkelmann B, Cemper-Kiesslich J, Kreindl G et al (2016) Yfiler® Plus amplification kit validation and calculation of forensic parameters for two Austrian populations. Forensic Sci Int Genet 21:90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.12.014

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Levav Cohen Y, Kleiman A, Spitzer A (2026) Concordance study between PowerPlex® ESI 16 Fast Kit and Investigator® 24plex GO! Kit. J Forensic Sci 71(1):533–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70178