Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1786–801.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):14–38.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1021–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franasiak JM, Alecsandru D, Forman EJ, Gemmell LC, Goldberg JM, Llarena N, et al. A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(6):1436–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lessey BA, Young SL. What exactly is endometrial receptivity? Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):611–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jin XY, Zhao LJ, Luo DH, Liu L, Dai YD, Hu XX, et al. Pinopode score around the time of implantation is predictive of successful implantation following frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2394–403.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, Gómez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Carranza F, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):818–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang XB, Qi QR, Wu KL, Xie QZ. Role of osteopontin in decidualization and pregnancy success. Reproduction. 2018;155(5):423–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krylova Y, Polyakova V, Kvetnoy I, Kogan I, Dzhemlikhanova L, Niauri D, et al. Immunohistochemical criteria for endometrial receptivity in I/II stage endometriosis IVF-treated patients. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(sup2):33–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Polanski LT, Baumgarten M. Endometrial receptivity testing and therapy in assisted Reproductive Treatment. Semin Reprod Med. 2021;39(1–02):27–33.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Casper RF. Frozen embryo transfer: evidence-based markers for successful endometrial preparation. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):248–51.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hernández-Vargas P, Muñoz M, Domínguez F. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(2):264–301.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hviid Saxtorph M, Persson G, Hallager T, Birch Petersen K, Eriksen JO, Larsen LG, et al. Are different markers of endometrial receptivity telling us different things about endometrial function? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020;84(6):e13323.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saare M, Lawarde A, Modhukur V, Mikeltadze I, Karro H, Minajeva A, et al. The expression pattern of endometrial receptivity genes is desynchronized between endometrium and matched endometriomas. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(4):713–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Edgell TA, Rombauts LJ, Salamonsen LA. Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(5):486–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Boitrelle F, Alter L, Selva J, Quibel T, Torre A. Uterine contractility and elastography as prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):961–e83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(2):202–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, Latt LD, Klauser AS, Melville DM, et al. Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications. Radiographics. 2017;37(3):855–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vora Z, Manchanda S, Sharma R, Das CJ, Hari S, Mathur S, et al. Transvaginal Shear Wave Elastography for Assessment of Endometrial and Subendometrial pathologies: a prospective pilot study. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(1):61–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao HX, Du YY, Guo YJ, Zhou JH, Sun CQ, Wen XD, et al. Application value of Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography in diagnosing the depth of infiltrating muscular layer of Endometrial Cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(9):1851–61.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li M, Zhu X, Wang L, Fu H, Zhao W, Zhou C et al. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity by ultrasound elastography to predict pregnancy outcome is a non-invasive and worthwhile method. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2023:1–15.

Shui X, Yu C, Li J, Jiao Y. Development and validation of a pregnancy prediction model based on ultrasonographic features related to endometrial receptivity. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(6):6156–65.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):551–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, et al. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(9):2427–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S, Andersen AG, Gabrielsen A, Andersen AN. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1545–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Devine K, Richter KS, Jahandideh S, Widra EA, McKeeby JL. Intramuscular progesterone optimizes live birth from programmed frozen embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):633–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ullah K, Rahman TU, Pan HT, Guo MX, Dong XY, Liu J, et al. Serum estradiol levels in controlled ovarian stimulation directly affect the endometrium. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;59(2):105–19.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chan JM, Sukumar AI, Ramalingam M, Ranbir Singh SS, Abdullah MF. The impact of endometrial thickness (EMT) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration on pregnancy outcomes: a 5-year retrospective cohort analysis in Malaysia. Fertil Res Pract. 2018;4:5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vaegter KK, Lakic TG, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):641–e82.

Article  PubMed