NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785

Article  Google Scholar 

Aaseth J, Boivin G, Andersen O (2012) Osteoporosis and trace elements–an overview. J Trace Elem Med Biol 26(2–3):149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2012.03.017

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R (2019) Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30(1):3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holroyd C, Cooper C, Dennison E (2018) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 22(5):671–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2008.06.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Engelke K (2012) Assessment of bone quality and strength with new technologies. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 19(6):474–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e32835a2609

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garg MK, Kharb S (2013) Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 17(2):203–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.109659

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Milisic L, Vegar-Zubovic S, Valjevac A, Hasanovic-Vučković S (2020) Bone mineral density assessment by Dxa Vs. Qct in postmenopausal females with central obesity. Curr Aging Sci 13(2):153–61. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609812666190912155525

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng X, Zhao K, Zha X et al (2021) Opportunistic screening using low-dose Ct and the prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a nationwide, multicenter study. J Bone Miner Res 36(3):427–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4187

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng Q, Li N, Wang Q et al (2019) The prevalence of osteoporosis in China, a Nationwide, multicenter Dxa survey. J Bone Miner Res 34(10):1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3757

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marshall LM, Lang TF, Lambert LC, Zmuda JM, Ensrud KE, Orwoll ES (2006) Dimensions and volumetric Bmd of the proximal femur and their relation to age among older US men. J Bone Miner Res 21(8):1197–206. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060506

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brett AD, Brown JK (2015) Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans. J Orthop Translat 3(4):178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.006

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Keaveny TM, Clarke BL, Cosman F et al (2020) Biomechanical computed tomography analysis (Bct) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 31(6):1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05384-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eggermont F, Verdonschot N, van der Linden Y, Tanck E (2019) Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using Ct-based finite element models. PLoS ONE 14(7):e0220564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220564

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xiongfeng T, Cheng Z, Meng H et al (2022) One novel phantom-less quantitative computed tomography system for auto-diagnosis of osteoporosis utilizes low-dose chest computed tomography obtained for Covid-19 screening. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:856753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.856753

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF (2004) Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 231(1):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311030191

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in CT: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255(3):683–686

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Golding SJ (2010) Radiation exposure in Ct: what is the professionally responsible approach? Radiology 255(3):683–686. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100449

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Museyko O, Heinemann A, Krause M (2014) A low-radiation exposure protocol for 3D QCT of the spine. Osteoporos Int 25(3):983–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2544-x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skornitzke S, Vats N, Kopytova T (2022) Asynchronous calibration of quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density assessment for opportunistic osteoporosis screening: phantom-based validation and parameter influence evaluation. Sci Rep 12(1):20729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24546-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garner HW, Paturzo MM, Gaudier G, Pickhardt PJ, Wessell DE (2017) Variation in attenuation in L1 trabecular bone at different tube voltages: caution is warranted when screening for osteoporosis with the use of opportunistic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(1):165–170. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16744

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Christe A, Szucs-Farkas Z, Huber A (2013) Optimal dose levels in screening chest CT for unimpaired detection and volumetry of lung nodules, with and without computer assisted detection at minimal patient radiation. PLoS ONE 8(12):e82919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082919

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jin S, Zhang B, Zhang L, Li S, Li S, Li P (2018) Lung nodules assessment in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to conventional dose CT. Quant Imaging Med Surg 8(5):480–490. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2018.06.05

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kazerooni EA, Austin JH, Black WC (2014) American college of radiology; society of thoracic radiology. ACR-STR practice parameter for the performance and reporting of lung cancer screening thoracic computed tomography (CT): 2014 (resolution 4). J Thorac Imaging 29(5):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000097

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butler PF, Kanal KM (2018) Diagnostic reference levels for adult patients in the United States. J Am Coll Radiol 15(6):932–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G et al (2007) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 Iscd official positions. J Clin Densitom 11(1):123–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010

Article  Google Scholar 

Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK, Fischer M, Dequeker J, Reeve J (1995) The European spine phantom–a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by Dxa and Qct. Eur J Radiol 20(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0720-048x(95)00631-y

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

European Spine Phantom (ESP). Company Website. PTW Company. Available at: https://www.qrm.de/en/products/european-spine-phantom

Adams JE (2009) Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 71(3):415–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.074

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao Y, Li K, Duanmu Y et al (2022) Accuracy, linearity and precision of spine Qct Vbmd phantom measurements for different brands of Ct scanner: a multicentre study. J Clin Densitom 25(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2021.02.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koch V, Hokamp NG, Albrecht MH et al (2021) Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative Ct: a phantom study. Eur Radiol Exp 5(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00241-1

Article  PubMed