World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage; 2018. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550420 (accessed March 2025).
Heesen M, Carvalho B, Carvalho JC, et al. International consensus statement on the use of uterotonic agents during Caesarean section. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1305–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14757
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mavrides E, Allard S, Chandraharan E, et al. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG 2016; 75: 875–82. Available from URL: https://amogsobgy.com/content/GTG%2052%20PPH%20BJOG%202016.pdf (accessed March 2025).
Hunter DJ, Schulz P, Wassenaar W. Effect of carbetocin, a long-acting oxytocin the postpartum uterus analog. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52: 60–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1992.103
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen-Lu N, Carvalho JC, Farine D, Seaward G, Ye XY, Balki M. Carbetocin at Cesarean delivery for labour arrest: a sequential allocation trial to determine the effective dose. Can J Anesth 2015; 62: 866–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0375-2
Cordovani D, Balki M, Farine D, Seaward G, Carvalho JC. Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effective dose. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 751–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9728-2
Drew T, Balki M, Farine D, Ye XY, Downey K, Carvalho JC. Carbetocin at elective Caesarean section: a sequential allocation trial to determine the minimum effective dose in obese women. Anaesthesia 2020; 75: 331–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14944
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tabl S, Balki M, Downey K, et al. Uterotonics in elective Caesarean delivery: a randomised non-inferiority study comparing carbetocin 20 μg and 100 μg. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 190–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14480
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Khan M, Balki M, Ahmed I, Farine D, Seaward G, Carvalho JC. Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a sequential allocation trial to determine the minimum effective dose. Can J Anesth 2014; 61: 242–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0082-9
McDonagh F, Carvalho JC, Abdulla S, et al. Carbetocin vs. oxytocin at elective Caesarean delivery: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of low- and high-dose regimens. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15714
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ibrahim ZM, Sayed Ahmed WA, Abd El-Hamid EM, Taha OT, Elbahie AM. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in hypertensive women undergoing elective Cesarean section. Hypertens Pregnancy 2020; 39: 319–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2020.1768268
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nucci B, Aya AGM, Aubry E, Ripart J. Carbetocin for prevention of postCesarean hemorrhage in women with severe preeclampsia: a before-after cohort comparison with oxytocin. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35: 321–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.017
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reyes OA, Gonzalez GM. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with severe preeclampsia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33: 1099–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35077-0
Bahr MH, Alkhatip AA, Ahmed AG, Elgamel AF, Abdelkader M, Hussein HA. Hemodynamic effects of oxytocin and carbetocin during elective Cesarean section in preeclamptic patients under spinal anesthesia: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Anesth Pain Med 2023; 13: e128782. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-128782
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen YT, Chen SF, Hsieh TT, Lo LM, Hung TH. A comparison of the efficacy of carbetocin and oxytocin on hemorrhage-related changes in women with Cesarean deliveries for different indications. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 57: 677–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.08.011
von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CW, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KW. Pre-eclampsia increases the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study in The Netherlands. PLoS One 2013; 8: 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081959
Anandakrishnan S, Balki M, Farine D, Seaward G, Carvalho JC. Carbetocin at elective Cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to determine the effective dose, part 2. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0028-2
Lavoie A, McCarthy RJ, Wong CA. The ED90 of prophylactic oxytocin infusion after delivery of the placenta during Cesarean delivery in laboring compared with nonlaboring women: an up-down sequential allocation dose-response study. Anesth Analg 2015; 121: 159–64. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000781
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135: E237–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003891
Dixon WJ, Mood AM. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J Am Stat Assoc 1948; 43: 109–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254
Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 144–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a
Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics 2002; 58: 171–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00171.x
Tyagi A, Mohan A, Singh Y, Luthra A, Garg D, Malhotra RK. Effective dose of prophylactic oxytocin infusion during Cesarean delivery in 90% population of nonlaboring patients with preeclampsia receiving magnesium sulfate therapy and normotensives: an up-down sequential allocation dose-response study. Anesth Analg 2022; 134: 303–11. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005701
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fan X, Xu T, Ding H, et al. DNA methylation-reprogrammed oxytocin receptor underlies insensitivity to oxytocin in pre-eclamptic placental vasculature. J Cell Mol Med 2019; 23: 4118–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14299
Comments (0)