Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM et al (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1 Suppl S):147S–161S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006
Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16(1):65–68. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19930101-11
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg 86(3):388–395. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14024
Franceschi F, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Gupta A et al (2023) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: State-of-the-art. J Isakos : Joint Disord Orthop Sports Med 8(5):306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.05.007
Greiner S, Schmidt C, König C et al (2013) Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty maintains rotational function of the remaining rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(3):940–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2692-x
Nunes J, Andrade R, Azevedo C et al (2022) Improved Clinical Outcomes After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 480(5):949–957. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002065
Freislederer F, Moroder P, Audigé L et al (2024) Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy—the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25(1):204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07312-5
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berton A, Gulotta LV, Longo UG et al (2021) Medialized versus Lateralized Center of Rotation in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JCM. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245868
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Werthel J‑D, Walch G, Vegehan E et al (2019) Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43(10):2349–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04365-3
Berhouet J, Garaud P, Favard L (2014) Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.009
Pak T, Ardebol J, Menendez ME et al (2024) Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 33(6S):S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.018
Bauer S, Blakeney WG, Meylan A et al (2024) Humeral head size predicts baseplate lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative computer model study. Jses Int 8(2):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.015
Ekelund AL, Poncet D (2024) Lateralization and inclination angle in reverse arthroplasty—what do we know? Shoulder Elbow. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241281910 (17585732241281910)
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rojas J, Lievano, Jiménez AM et al (2023) Preoperative planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed tomography scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality. Ann Joint 8:37. https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-23-20
Freislederer F, Toft F, Audigé L et al (2022) Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1–3: does the design make a difference? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(2):341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.022
Holschen M, Kiriazis A, Bockmann B et al (2022) Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol : Orthop Traumatol 32(2):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02976-4
Werner BC, Lederman E, Gobezie R et al (2021) Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30(11):2498–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021
Chelli M, Walch G, Azar M et al (2024) Glenoid lateralization and subscapularis repair are independent predictive factors of improved internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 48(1):127–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06048-6
Carrazana-Suarez LF, Panico LC, Smolinski MP et al (2022) Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(6S):S158–S165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.029
Lee J‑H, Chun Y‑M, Kim D‑S et al (2021) Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30(11):2533–2542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145
Cogan CJ, Ho JC, Entezari V et al (2023) The Influence of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Design on Biomechanics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 16(3):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-023-09820-8
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wittmann T, Denard PJ, Werner BC et al (2024) Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: metal vs. Bone Offset Differ Implant Des Jses Int 8(4):845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.006
Castricini R, Mercurio M, Galasso O et al (2024) Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 33(2):e58–e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
Kusin DJ, Teytelbaum DE, Teusink MJ et al (2023) Outcomes of femoral head allograft for the management of glenoid bone defects in revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a case-controlled study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 32(6S):S32–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.022
Franceschetti E, Ranieri R, Giovanetti de Sanctis E et al (2020) Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.023
Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Bessière C et al (2020) Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29(10):2111–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.008
Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y et al (2011) Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2558–2567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1775-4
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boileau P, Morin-Salvo N, Gauci M‑O et al (2017) Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26(12):2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.024
Paul RA, Maldonado-Rodriguez N, Docter S et al (2019) Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 28(12):2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.011
Nunes B, Linhares D, Costa F et al (2021) Lateralized versus nonlateralized glenospheres in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30(7):1700–1713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.041
Dean EW, Dean NE, Wright TW et al (2022) Clinical outcomes related to glenosphere overhang in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lateralized humeral design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(10):2106–2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.014
Comments (0)