Amano, Y., & Wakao, Y. (2022). Women’s sensitivity to men’s past relationships: Reliable information use for mate-choice copying in humans. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00295-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Bastanfard, A., Nik, M. A., & Dehshibi, M. M. (2007). Iranian face database with age, pose and expression. 2007 International Conference on Machine Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMV.2007.4469272

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review Of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

Article  Google Scholar 

Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62(4), 647–670. Https://doi.org/10.2307/1131166.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2017). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. In Interpersonal development (pp. 297–325). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204

Charnov, E. L. (1993). Life history invariants: Some explorations of symmetry in evolutionary ecology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198540724.001.0001

Article  Google Scholar 

Chisholm, J. S. (1996). The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization. Human Nature, 7, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733488

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chu, S. (2012). I like who you like, but only if i like you: Female character affects mate-choice copying. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(6), 691–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.029

Article  Google Scholar 

Dehshibi, M. M., & Bastanfard, A. (2010). A new algorithm for age recognition from facial images. Signal Processing, 90(8), 2431–2444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.02.015

Article  Google Scholar 

Dehshibi, M. M., & Shanbehzadeh, J. (2019). Cubic norm and kernel-based bi-directional PCA: Toward age-aware facial kinship verification. The Visual Computer, 35, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-017-1442-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., Hill, D., Wenner, C. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26(2), 243–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Hartnett, J., & Elder, D. (1973). Princess and nice frog - study in person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37(3), 863–866. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1973.37.3.863

Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jonason, P. K., Czerwiński, S. K., Brewer, G., Cândea, C. A., De Backer, C. J., Fernández, A. M., Garcia, J. R., Koehn, M. A., Kruger, D. J., & Massar, K. (2023). Three factors of the intrasexual competition scale? Personality and Individual Differences, 213, Article 112312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112312

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones, B. C., Boothroyd, L., Feinberg, D. R., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Age at menarche predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculinized male voices in adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(7), 860–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1611), 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(4), 156–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4%3c156::AID-EVAN5%3e3.0.CO;2-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407961

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kruger, D. J. (2017). Brief self-report scales assessing life history dimensions of mating and parenting effort. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), Article 1474704916673840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916673840

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lewandowski, J. G. W., Aron, A., & Gee, J. (2007). Personality goes a long way: The malleability of opposite-sex physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships, 14(4), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00172.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Lu, H. J., Wong, K.-C., & Chang, L. (2017). The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.047

Article  Google Scholar 

Mell, H., Safra, L., Algan, Y., Baumard, N., & Chevallier, C. (2018). Childhood environmental harshness predicts coordinated health and reproductive strategies: A cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample from France. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.08.006

Article  Google Scholar 

Mikach, S. M., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). What distinguishes women with unusually high numbers of sex partners? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00045-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Nettle, D. (2011). Flexibility in reproductive timing in human females: Integrating ultimate and proximate explanations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0073

Article  Google Scholar 

Niu, C., & Zheng, L. (2020). Reproductive strategies may predict women’s preferences for male facial masculinity. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, Article 110202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110202

Article  Google Scholar 

Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r- and K selection. The American Naturalist, 1(04), 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1086/282697

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodeheffer, C. D., Proffitt Leyva, R. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), Article 1474704916652144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential k theory and race differences in E and N. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(6), 769–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90088-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Schulman, G. I., & Hoskins, M. (1986). Perceiving the male versus the female face. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00938

Article  Google Scholar 

Stearns, S. C. (1998). The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6020304.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Trivers, R. L. (2017). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Routledge.

Valentova, J. V., Junior, F. P. M., Štěrbová, Z., Varella, M. A. C., & Fisher, M. L. (2020). The association between dark triad traits and sociosexuality with mating and parenting efforts: A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, Article 109613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109613

Article  Google Scholar 

Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Waynforth, D., Delwadia, S., & Camm, M. (2005). The influence of women’s mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.003

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang, J., & Anderson, R. C. (2022). Exploring the influence of race in mate copying using former partner evaluations: Race and mate copying. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(4), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-022-00343-y

Article  Google Scholar