Davies BM, Khan DZ, Barzangi K, Ali A, Mowforth OD, Nouri A, et al. We choose to call it ‘degenerative cervical myelopathy’: findings of AO spine RECODE-DCM, an international and multi-stakeholder partnership to agree a standard unifying term and definition for a disease. Global Spine J. 2024;14:503–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, Middleton JW, Aarabi B, Arnold PM, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine J. 2017;7:70S–83S. 3 Suppl

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Kurpad S, Brodke DS, Wilson JR, Smith JS, et al. Change in functional impairment, disability, and quality of life following operative treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2017;7:53S–69S. 3 Suppl

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nouri A, Tessitore E, Molliqaj G, Meling T, Schaller K, Nakashima H, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: development and natural history [AO spine RECODE-DCM research priority number 2]. Global Spine J. 2022;12:39S–54S. 1_suppl

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AO Spine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1651–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulati S, Vangen-Lonne V, Nygaard OP, Gulati AM, Hammer TA, Johansen TO, et al. Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a nationwide registry-based observational study with patient-reported outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2021;89:704–11.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karim SM, Cadotte DW, Wilson JR, Kwon BK, Jacobs WB, Johnson MG, et al. Effectiveness of surgical decompression in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: results of the canadian prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2021;89:844–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tetreault LA, Rhee J, Prather H, Kwon BK, Wilson JR, Martin AR, et al. Change in function, pain, and quality of life following structured nonoperative treatment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2017;7:42S–52S. 3 Suppl

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boerger TF, Hyngstrom AS, Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Kwon BK, et al. Developing peri-operative rehabilitation in degenerative cervical myelopathy [AO spine RECODE-DCM research priority number 6]: an unexplored opportunity? Global Spine J. 2022;12:97S–108S. 1_suppl

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mallard F, Wong JJ, Lemeunier N, Cote P. Effectiveness of multimodal rehabilitation interventions for management of cervical radiculopathy in adults: an updated systematic review from the ontario protocol for traffic injury management (optima) collaboration. J Rehabil Med. 2022;54:jrm00318.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the queen square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10:307–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tetreault L, Kalsi-Ryan S, Benjamin D, Nanna-Lohkamp L, Garwood P, Martin AR, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a practical approach to diagnosis. Global Spine J. 2022;12:1881–93.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Bartels R, et al. The modified japanese orthopaedic association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:78–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adams R. Revised physical activity readiness questionnaire. Can Fam Physician. 1999;45:992.

PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Salame K, Grundshtein A, Regev G, Khashan M, Lador R, Lidar Z. Acute Presentation of cervical myelopathy following manipulation therapy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2019;21:542–5.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fletcher JP, Bandy WD. Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:640–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, Breton E, Corriveau H. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:242–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krause DA, Hansen KA, Hastreiter MJ, Kuhn TN, Peichel ML, Hollman JH. A comparison of various cervical muscle strength testing methods using a handheld dynamometer. Sports Health. 2019;11:59–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Selistre LFA, Melo CS, Noronha MA. Reliability and validity of clinical tests for measuring strength or endurance of cervical muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:1210–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang YC, Magasi SR, Bohannon RW, Reuben DB, McCreath HE, Bubela DJ, et al. assessing dexterity function: a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH toolbox. J Hand Ther. 2011;24:313–20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hervault M, Balto JM, Hubbard EA, Motl RW. Reliability, precision, and clinically important change of the nine-hole peg test in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017;40:91–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Therapists ASoH. Clinical Assessment recommendations. MacDermid JSG, Valdes K,, editor: American Society of Hand Therapists; 2015.

Bobos P, Nazari G, Lu Z, MacDermid JC. Measurement properties of the hand grip strength assessment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:553–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–8.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Malone A, Meldrum D, Bolger C. Gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:2456–66.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Malone A, Meldrum D, Gleeson J, Bolger C. Electromyographic characteristics of gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2538–44.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Christopher A, Kraft E, Olenick H, Kiesling R, Doty A. The reliability and validity of the timed up and go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43:1799–813.

Article