Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, Ogura Y, Koga S, Ida Y, et al. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology. 1996;200:851–6. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756943.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212:673–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se36673.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, Ishaque N, Walthers EM, Regn J, et al. Real-time CT-fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:735–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(98)70383-5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Saika Y, Ogura Y, Doi K, Misaki T, Shimizu M, Narabayashi I. Results and complications of CT-guided biopsy with CT fluoroscopy. Haigan. 2002;42:255–9. https://doi.org/10.2482/haigan.42.255.
Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, et al. Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001;219:515–20. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma41515.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kinoshita E, Miyazaki H, Ogawa K, Komiya I, Kato T. Reduction of operator exposure radiation dose and evaluation of image quality using half scan in CT fluoroscopy. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2020;76:1266–75. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.12.1266.
Kato N, Yuki I, Ishibashi T, Ikemura A, Kan I, Nishimura K, et al. Visualization of stent apposition after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using high resolution 3D fusion images acquired by C-arm CT. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:192–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014966.
Söderman M, Babic D, Homan R, Andersson T. 3D roadmap in neuroangiography: technique and clinical interest. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:735–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1417-1.
Supanich M, Siewerdsen J, Fahrig R, Farahani K, Gang GJ, Helm P, et al. AAPM Task Group Report 238. AAPM Task Group Report 238: 3D C-arms with volumetric imaging capability. Med Phys. 2023;50:e904–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16245.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Knott EA, Troville JL, Reynoso CA, Rose SD, Wagner MG, Lee FT, et al. Physician scatter dose in interventional CT fluoroscopy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024;25:e14355. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14355.
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fukuda A, Lin PJP, Matsubara K, Miyati T. Measurement of gantry rotation time in modern CT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:4517. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4517.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Radiological protection in. cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). ICRP Publication 129; 2015.
Nakayama R, Matsubara K. The study for standardization of dose evaluation method in cone-beam CT. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2024;80:374–84. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435.
Seguchi S, Saijou T, Ishikawa Y, Koyama S. Radiation dose evaluation in 3D rotation angiography and cone-beam computed tomography with a flat panel detector. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2014;70:646–52. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.7.646.
Haba T, Yasui K, Saito Y, Kobayashi M, Koyama S. A new cone-beam computed tomography dosimetry method providing optimal measurement positions: A Monte Carlo study. Phys Med. 2021;81:130–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.003.
Hwang Y-S, Tsai H-Y, Lin Y-Y, Lui K-W. Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation. BMC Med Imaging. 2018;18:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0247-7.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abuhaimed A, Martin CJ, Sankaralingam M, Gentle DJ. A Monte Carlo investigation of cumulative dose measurements for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:1519–42. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/4/1519.
Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, NIST IR, National Institute of Standards and Technology. MD: 1995 p p. 5632. Report No.: nist ir 5632. https://doi.org/10.6028/. NIST.IR.5632. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetry interest. Gaithersburg.
ICRP Publication 102. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). Ann ICRP. 2007.
Hirayama H, Namito Y, Bielajew AF et al. The EGS5 code system; 2005.
Verfaillie G, Rutten J, Dewulf L, D’Asseler Y, Bacher K. Influence of x-ray spectrum and bowtie filter characterisation on the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulated organ doses: validation in a whole-body CT scanning mode. Phys Med. 2024;127:104837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104837.
Tucker DM, Barnes GT, Chakraborty DP. Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra. Med Phys. 1991;18:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596709.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McKenney SE, Nosratieh A, Gelskey D, Yang K, Huang SY, Chen L, et al. Experimental validation of a method characterizing bow tie filters in CT scanners using a real-time dose probe. Med Phys. 2011;38:1406–15. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3551990.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin P-JP, Beck TJ, Borras C, Cohen G, Jucius RA, Kriz RJ, et al. Specification and acceptance testing of computed tomography scanners. American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 1993. https://doi.org/10.37206/38.
Kim S, Song H, Samei E, Yin FF, Yoshizumi TT. Computed tomography dose index and dose length product for cone-beam CT: Monte Carlo simulations of a commercial system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12:3395. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3395.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ichikawa N, Matsubara K, Fukuda A, Yamamoto H. Measurement accuracy of CT beam width with a portable flat-panel detector. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2020;76:161–7. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.2.161.
Berger MJ, Coursey JS, Zucker MA, et al. Stopping-power & range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions. NIST Standard Ref Database. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4NC7P. 124 Physical measurement laboratory.
Fukuda A, Lin PJP, Matsubara K, Miyati T. Evaluation of gantry rotation overrun in axial CT scanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:4901. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4901.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(Suppl):S538-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.026.
Mendes M, Costa F, Figueira C, Madeira P, Teles P, Vaz P. Assessment of patient dose reduction by bismuth shielding in CT using measurements, GEANT4 and MCNPX simulations. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv059.
Bostani M, McMillan K, DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, McNitt-Gray MF. Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges. Med Phys. 2014;41:112101. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4887807.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sharma S, Kapadia A, Fu W, Abadi E, Segars WP, Samei E. A real-time Monte Carlo tool for individualized dose estimations in clinical CT. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:215020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab467f.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Verfaillie G, Rutten J, D’Asseler Y, Bacher K. Accuracy of patient-specific CT organ doses from Monte Carlo simulations: influence of CT-based voxel models. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024;47:989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01422-z.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lefol RO, Lemaréchal Y, Sagona A, Boivin J, Joubert P, Després P. Fast personalized CT dose calculations with GPUMCD. Physica Medica. 2026;141:105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105693.
Comments (0)