Musallam KM, Cappellini MD, Wood JC, Motta I, Graziadei G, Tamim H, et al. Elevated liver iron concentrations is a maker of increased morbidity in patient with β thalassemia intermedia. Haematologica. 2011;96(11):1605–12. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2011.047852.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Idilman IS, Akata D, Ozmen MN, Karcaaltincaba M. Different forms of iron accumulation in the liver on MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015; 22(1): 22 – 8. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.15094
Reeder SB, Yakoo T, Franca M, Hernando D, Alberich-Bayarri A, Alustiza JM, et al. Quantification of liver iron overload with MRI: review and guidelines from the ESGAR and SAR. Radiology. 2023;307(1):e221856. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221856.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alustica JM, Castella A, Zapata E, Urreta I, Salvador E, Emparanza JI. Non-invasive measurement of liver iron concentration by magnetic resonance imaging and its clinical usefulness. Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(3):784–91. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/119118.
Zhou X, Jia X, Chen Y, Song B. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in liver iron overload: from precise quantification to prognosis assessment. Biomedicines. 2024;12(11):2456. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112456.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Rao SS, Sgrazzutti C, Vicentin I, Kambadakone A, et al. Dual-energy CT applications on liver imaging: what radiologists and radiographers should know? A systematic review. Abdom Radiol. 2024;49(11):3811–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04380-y.
Tsurusaki M, Sofue K, Hori M, Sasaki K, Ishii K, Murakami T, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography of the liver: used in clinical practices and applications. Diagnostics. 2021;11(2):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostic11020161.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsai YS, Chen JS, Wang CK, Lu CH, Cheng CN, Kuo CS. Quantitative assessment of iron in heart and liver phantoms using dual-energy computed tomography. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8:907–12. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1813.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Luo XF, Xie XQ, Cheng S, Yang Y, Yan J, Zhang H. Dual-energy CT for patients suspected of having liver iron overload: can virtual iron content imaging accurately quantify liver iron content. Radiology. 2015;277(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015141856.
Joe E, Kim SH, Lee KB, Jang JJ, Lee JY, Lee JK, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of dual-source dual-energy CT for noninvasive determination of hepatic iron accumulation. Radiology. 2012;262:126–35. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110060.
Jiang X, Hintenlang DE, White RD. Lower limit of iron quantification using dual-energy CT-a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(1): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13124
Zhang R, Cruz-Bastida J, Gomez-Cardona D, Hayes JW. Quantitative accuracy of CT numbers: Theoretical analyses and experimental studies. Med Phys. 2018;45(10):4519–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13119.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Flatten V, Friedrich A, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Zink K. A phantom based evaluation of the dose prediction and effects in treatment plans, when calculating on a direct CT reconstruction. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(3):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12824.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35:213–25. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.106.037846.
Bhosale P, Le O, Balachandran A, Fox P, Paulson E, Tamm E. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of single-source dual-energy computed tomography and 120-kVp computed tomography for the assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39(6):907–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000295.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schmidt AMA, Grunz JP, Petritsch B, Gruschwitz P, Knarr J, Huflage H, et al. Combination of iterative metal artifact reduction and virtual monoenergetic reconstruction using split-filter dual-energy CT in patients with dental artifact on head and neck CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;218(4):716–27. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26772.
McCollough CH, Boedeker K, Cody D, Duan X, Flohr T, Halliburton SS, et al. Principles and application of multienergy CT: Report of AAPM Task Group 291. Med Phys. 2020;47(7):e881–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14157.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Layman RR, Leng S, Boedeker KL, Burk LM, Dang H, Duan X, et al. AAPM task group report 299: quality control in multi-energy computed tomography. Med Phys. 2024;51:7012–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17322.
Greffier J, Si-Mohamed S, Guiu B, Fradon J, Loisy M, de Oliveira F, et al. Comparison of virtual monoenergectic imaging between a rapid kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography with deep-learning and four-dual energy CTs with iterative reconstruction. Quant Imag Med Surg. 2022;12(2):1149–62. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-708.
Fisher MA, Reiner CS, Raptic D, Donati O, Goetti R, Clavien PA, et al. Quantification of liver iron content with CT-added value of dual energy. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(8):1727–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2119-1.
Xie T, Li Y, He G, Zhang Z, Shi Q, Cheng G. The influence of liver fat deposition on the quantification of the liver-iron fraction using fast-kilovoltage switching dual-energy CT imaging and material decomposition technique: an in vitro experimental study. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(4):654–61. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2019.04.06.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guevara AEM, Consuegra IADA, Lewis MSM. Systemic iron overload: review of pathophysiology and clinical-radiological diagnostic approach. WJARR. 2024;22(2):345–53. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.2.1383.
Treb K, Li k. Accuracy of weighted CTDI estimating average dose delivered to CTDI phantoms: An experimental study. Med Phys. 2020;47(12):6484–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14528.
Zhong J, Shen H, Chen Y, Xia Y, Shi X, Lu W. Evaluation of image quality and detectability of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in single- and dual-energy CT. J Digit Imaging. 2023;36(4):1390–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00806-z.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malvarosa I, Massaroni C, Liguori C, Paul J, Beomonte Zobel B, Saccomandi P, Vogl TJ, Silvestri S, Schena E. Estimation of liver iron concentration by dual energy CT images: influence of x-ray energy on sensitivity. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc. 2014;5129–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944779.
Zhong J, Wu Z, Wang L, Chen Y, Xia Y, Wang L, et al. Impacts of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V and deep learning image reconstruction algorithms on robustness of CT radiomics feature: opportunity for minimizing radiomics variability among scans of different dose levels. J Imaging Inf Med. 2024;37(1):123–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-23-00901-1.
Yao Y, Su X, Deng L, Zhang J, Xu Z, Li J, et al. Effects of tube voltage, radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction strength level on the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose chest CT. Cancer Imaging. 2024;24(1):123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00770-z.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):592–600. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8580.
Hoyoshi K, Sato K, Homma N, Mori I. Noise-related inaccuracies in the quantitative evaluation of CT artifacts. Radiol Phys Technol. 2025;18(1):157–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00869-9.
Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Martin SS, Nance JW, Duguay TM, Wichmann JL, et al. Review of clinical applications for virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT. Radiology. 2019;293:260–71. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182297.
Gammex Inc. User’s guide, Mulit-energy CT phantom, Model 1472. Middleton, WI; 2017.
Fernandez-Perez GC, Fraga Pinerio C, Onate Miranda M, Diez Bianco M, Mato Chan J, Collazos Martinez MA. Dual-energy CT: technical considerations and clinical application. Radiologia. 2022;64(5):445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.06.003.
Comments (0)