Development and evaluation of sub-tropically adapted sweet corn hybrids for dual-purpose utilization with emphasis on yield and fodder quality traits

Abd AA, Aini N. Assessing the nutritional composition of sweet corn (Zea mays l. var. saccharata) stover and kernel corn (Zea mays l. var. indentata) stover for ruminant feed. J Asian Sci Res. 2023;13(3):136–48. https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.v13i3.4907.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alan Ö, Kinaci G, Kinaci E, Basciftci ZB, Sonmez K, Evrenosoglu Y, Kutlu I. Kernel quality of some sweet corn varieties in relation to processing. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2014. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4229425

Alawe K, Mehta AK, Singh O. Genetic analysis of correlation coefficient and path analysis of fodder yield and its components in maize (Zea mays). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(12):791–6. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.094.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Al-Shammari AM, Al-Azzawi ME Analysis of combining ability, gene action and heritability of yield and some of its components in sweet corn (Zea mays L. Var. saccharata). In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science (Vol. 1549, No. 1, p. 012140). IOP Publishing. (2025)

Anushree G, Soumya TM, Ashok M, Shilpashree YP, Kumar O. Evaluating fodder productivity, quality characteristics and profitability of sweet corn based vegetable legume intercropping system in Karnataka, India. J Sci Res Rep. 2025;31(7):12–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Arif M, Pourouchottamane R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Rai B, Gangwar C, et al. Optimizing year-round fodder production for sustainable goat based integrated farming systems in the Yamuna ravines of Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Agric Sc. 2025;95(3):310–5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162595.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Aslam M, Iqbal A, Zamir MI, Mubeen M, Amin M. Effect of different nitrogen levels and seed rates on yield and quality of maize fodder. Crop Environ. 2011;2(2):47–51.

Google Scholar 

Azim A, Naseer Z, Ali A. Nutritional evaluation of maize fodder at two different vegetative stages. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 1989;2(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1989.27.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barrière Y. Brown-midrib genes in maize and their efficiency in dairy cow feeding. Perspectives for breeding improved silage maize targeting gene modifications in the monolignol and p-hydroxycinnamate pathways. Maydica. 2017;62(2):1–19.

Google Scholar 

Barrière Y, Argillier O. Brown-midrib genes of maize: a review. Agronomie. 1993;13(10):865–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bashir M, Khuroo NS, Dar ZA, Wani A, Rashid Z, Shikar AB. Multivariate analysis of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm lines under temperate niches. Indian J Plant Genet Resourc. 2024;37(03):473–81.

Google Scholar 

Baveja A, Muthusamy V, Panda KK, Zunjare RU, Das AK, Chhabra R, et al. Development of multinutrient-rich biofortified sweet corn hybrids through genomics-assisted selection of shrunken2, opaque2, lcyE and crtRB1 genes. J Appl Genet. 2021;62:419–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-021-00633-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhaumik S, Rajeev SK, Fayaz S. Impact of nutrients on the development and yield of fodder maize (Zea mays L.): a review. Agric Rev. 2025;46(2):302–8.

Google Scholar 

Bocianowski J, Waligóra H, Majchrzak L. Genotype by year interaction for selected traits in sweet maize (Zea maize L) hybrids using AMMI model. Euphytica. 2024;220(6):89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03352-z.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Human Genet. 1980;32(3):314.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Casler MD, Vogel KP. Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Sci. 1999;39(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010003x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chaudhary DP, Jat SL, Kumar R, Kumar A, Kumar B. Fodder quality of maize: its preservation. In Maize: Nutrition dynamics and novel uses (pp. 153–160). New Delhi: Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1623-0_132013

Chaudhary DP, Kumar A, Kumar R, Singode A, Mukri G, Sah RP, et al. Evaluation of normal and specialty corn for fodder yield and quality traits. Range Manag Agrofor. 2016;37(1):79–83.

Google Scholar 

Chauhan HS, Zunjare RU, Rashmi T, Muthusamy V, Das AK, Mishra SJ, et al. Enrichment of vitamin A and vitamin E in sweet corn kernels through genomics-assisted introgression of mutant version of crtRB1 and vte4 genes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2025;197(3):1889–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-024-05104-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cherney JH, Cherney DJR, Akin DE, Axtell JD. Potential of brown-midrib, low-lignin mutants for improving forage quality. Adv Agron. 1991;46:157–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60580-5.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chhabra R, Hossain F, Muthusamy V, Baveja A, Mehta BK, Zunjare RU. Development and validation of gene-based markers for shrunken2-Reference allele and their utilization in marker-assisted sweet corn (Zea mays Sachharata) breeding programme. Plant Breed. 2019;139:1135–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12872.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chhabra R, Hossain F, Muthusamy V, Baveja A, Mehta BK, Uttamrao Zunjare R. Development and validation of gene-based markers for shrunken2-Reference allele and their utilization in marker-assisted sweet corn (Zea mays Sachharata) breeding programme. Plant Breed. 2020;139(6):1135–44.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chhabra R, Muthusamy V, Baveja A, Katral A, Mehta B, Zunjare RU, et al. Allelic variation in shrunken2 gene affecting kernel sweetness in mutant- and wild-type maize inbreds. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0274732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274732.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chhabra R, Zunjare RU, Gul I, Mishra SJ, Duo H, Bhatt V, et al. Enrichment of phytoglycogen in sweet corn kernels through genomics-assisted selection. Funct Integr Genomics. 2025;25(1):212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-025-01710-1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dash PK, Ganesan KN, Manivannan N, Kumar SV, Senthil N, Pushpam R. Revolutionizing livestock sustainability: pioneering breeding strategies for superior forage biomass and quality. HORIZON. 2024;11(4):1093–107. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4094.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1983;1(4):19–21.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

FAOSTAT Statistical database 2025. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL

Fornalé S, Rencoret J, Garcia-Calvo L, Capellades M, Encina A, Santiago R, et al. Cell wall modifications triggered by the down-regulation of Coumarate 3-hydroxylase-1 in maize. Plant Sci. 2015;236:272–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.007.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Galal AA, Safhi FA, Al Aboud NM, Aljabri M, Kucher DE, Kamara MM, et al. Molecular diversity and genetic potential of new maize inbred lines across varying sowing conditions in arid environment. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):2809.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gao JL, Wang P, Zhou CH, Li P, Tang HY, Zhang JB, et al. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure and the fermentation characteristics of silage prepared with microbial additives. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2019;32(12):1854. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garcia A. Chapter 18: Corn silage production and utilization. iGROW corn: best management practices. South Dakota State University, 1–12. 2016

Garcia G, Montero F, Torres ME, Alvarez S, Vasquez W, Villantoy A, et al. Adaptability, yield stability, and agronomic performance of improved purple corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids across diverse agro-ecological zones in Peru. Int J Plant Biol. 2025;17(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb17010003.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gavandi MR, Dorale TK. Assessment of forage yield, nutritional profile, and economic viability of sweet corn-vegetable legume intercropping in Karnataka, India. Eur J Emerg Sci Res. 2024;1(01):1–16.

Google Scholar 

Ghada AA, Ibrahim AIA. Evaluation of some sweet corn hybrids for agronomic traits and technological parameters under different planting dates. Suez Canal Univ J Food Sci. 2019;6(1):49–63.

Google Scholar 

Greveniotis V, Bouloumpasi E, Skendi A, Korkovelos A, Kantas D, Ipsilandis CG. Stability of forage quality traits in artificial meadows across Greek environments. Agriculture. 2025;15(24):2595. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15242595.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gupta BK, Bhardwaj BL, Ahuja AK. Nutritional value of forage crops of Punjab. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University Publication; 2004.

Google Scholar 

Hossain F, Nepolean T, Vishwakarma AK, Pandey N, Prasanna BM, Gupta HS. Mapping and validation of microsatellite markers linked to sugary1 and shrunken2 genes in maize (Zea mays L.). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;24(2):135–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-013-0245-3.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hu Y, Colantonio V, Müller BS, Leach KA, Nanni A, Finegan C, et al. Genome assembly and population genomic analysis provide insights into the evolution of modern sweet corn. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1227.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ibrahim M, Rafiq M, Sultan A, Akram M, Goheer MA. Green fodder yield and quality evaluation of maize and cowpea sown alone and in combination. J Agric Res (JAR). 2006;44(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.58475/1kefp341.

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif