Gu C, Li K, Li R, Li L, Li X, Dai X, He Y. Chromosomal aneuploidy associated with clinical characteristics of pregnancy loss. Front Genet. 2021;12: 667697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.667697.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Homer HA. Modern management of recurrent miscarriage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12920.
Hong Li Y and Marren A. Recurrent pregnancy loss: a summary of international evidence-based guidelines and practice. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018;47(7):432–6. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-01-18-4459
Laurino MY, Bennett RL, Saraiya DS, Baumeister L, Doyle DL, Leppig K, Pettersen B, Resta R, Shields L, Uhrich S, Varga EA, Raskind WH. Genetic evaluation and counseling of couples with recurrent miscarriage: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2005;14(3):165–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-3241-5.
Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kung A, Munne S, Bankowski B, Coates A, Wells D. Validation of next-generation sequencing for comprehensive chromosome screening of embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(6):760–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.002.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Theisen A, Shaffer LG. Disorders caused by chromosome abnormalities. Appl Clin Genet. 2010;3:159–74. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S8884.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Philipp T, Philipp K, Reiner A, Beer F, Kalousek DK. Embryoscopic and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1724–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg309.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, Wells D. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132(9):1001–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0.
Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H, Kuroda T, Aoyama N, Kato K, Kobayashi R, Fukuda A, Utsunomiya T, Kuwahara A, Saito H, Takeshita T, Irahara M. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(12):2340–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez229.
Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao N, Liu P, Huang J. Variations in chromosomal aneuploidy rates in IVF blastocysts and early spontaneous abortion chorionic villi. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(3):527–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01682-9.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jain M, and Singh M (2024) Assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques. In StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35015434.
Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi N, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Impact of maternal age on oocyte and embryo competence. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9: 327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00327.
Wilkins-Haug L, Amor DJ, Savulescu J. ISPD 2021 debate-all in vitro fertilization cycles should involve pre-implantation genetic testing to improve fetal health and pregnancy outcomes. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(8):1015–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6156.
Sanders KD, Silvestri G, Gordon T, Griffin DK. Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(12):3277–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02349-0.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, Sun X, Ling X, Li H, Hao C, Tan J, Yang J, Zhu Y, Liu F, Chen D, Wei D, Lu J, Ni T, Zhou W, Wu K, Gao Y, Shi Y, Lu Y, Zhang T, Wu W, Ma X, Ma H, Fu J, Zhang J, Meng Q, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Live birth with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2047–58. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103613.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Daphnis DD, Goodall NN, Mania A, Griffiths T, Gordon A, Wells D. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(2):480–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq344.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sciorio R, Tramontano L, Catt J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(1):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1641194.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen HF, Chen M, Ho HN. An overview of the current and emerging platforms for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) in in vitro fertilization programs. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(4):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.004.
Friedenthal J, Maxwell SM, Munne S, Kramer Y, McCulloh DH, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):627–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Handyside AH. 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1965.
Neumann K, Sermon K, Bossuyt P, Goossens V, Geraedts J, Traeger-Synodinos J, Parriego M, Schmutzler A, van der Ven K, Rudolph-Rothfeld W, Vonthein R, Griesinger G. An economic analysis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by polar body biopsy in advanced maternal age. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2020;127(6):710–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16089.
Quail MA, Smith M, Coupland P, Otto TD, Harris SR, Connor TR, Bertoni A, Swerdlow HP, Gu Y. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics. 2012;13: 341. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-341.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scionti F, Di Martino MT, Pensabene L, Bruni V, Concolino D. The cytoscan HD array in the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. High-Throughput. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7030028.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, Munne S. Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet. 2014;51(8):553–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102497.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(12):2849–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh536.
Macville M, Veldman T, Padilla-Nash H, Wangsa D, O’Brien P, Schrock E, Ried T. Spectral karyotyping, a 24-colour FISH technique for the identification of chromosomal rearrangements. Histochem Cell Biol. 1997;108(4–5):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004180050169.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344(6268):768–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/344768a0.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lim HJ, Kim YJ, Yang JH, Kim EJ, Choi JS, Jung SH, Ahn HK, Han JY, Kim MY, Choi KH, Kim JM, Kim YM, Park SY, Ryu HM. Amniotic fluid interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of aneuploidy; experiences in 130 prenatal cases. J Korean Med Sci. 2002;17(5):589–92. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2002.17.5.589.
Comments (0)