Bek J, Gowen E, Vogt S, Crawford TJ, Poliakoff E (2019) Combined action observation and motor imagery influences hand movement amplitude in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.11.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bek J, Holmes PS, Craig CE, Franklin ZC, Sullivan M, Webb J, Crawford TJ, Vogt S, Gowen E, Poliakoff E (2021) Action imagery and observation in neurorehabilitation for Parkinson’s disease (ACTION-PD): development of a user-informed home training intervention to improve functional hand movements. Parkinson’s Dis 2021:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4559519

Article  Google Scholar 

Bek J, Humphries S, Poliakoff E, Brady N (2022) Mental rotation of hands and objects in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: differentiating motor imagery and visuospatial ability. Exp Brain Res 240(7):1991–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06389-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blampain J, Ott L, Delevoye-Turrell YN (2018) Seeing action simulation as it unfolds: the implicit effects of action scenes on muscle contraction evidenced through the use of a grip-force sensor. Neuropsychologia 114:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.026

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bolzoni F, Bruttini C, Esposti R, Castellani C, Cavallari P (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation of SMA modulates anticipatory postural adjustments without affecting the primary movement. Behav Brain Res 291:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.044

Borges LR, Fernandes AB, Melo LP, Guerra RO, Campos TF (2018) Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Database System Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011887.pub2

Article  Google Scholar 

Brady N, Maguinness C, Choisdealbha ÁN (2011) My hand or yours? Markedly different sensitivity to egocentric and allocentric views in the hand laterality task. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023316

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Caligiore D, Mustile M, Spalletta G, Baldassarre G (2017) Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 72:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carlsen AN, Eagles JS, MacKinnon CD (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area modulates the preparatory activation level in the human motor system. Behav Brain Res 279:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.009

Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB (2010) ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 50(3):1148–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cerritelli B, Maruff P, Wilson P, Currie J (2000) The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 108(1):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00138-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chandrasekharan S, Binsted G, Ayres F, Higgins L, Welsh TN (2012) Factors that affect action possibility judgements: recent experience with the action and the current body state. Q J Exp Psychol 65(5):976–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.638720

Article  Google Scholar 

Chye S, Valappil AC, Wright DJ, Frank C, Shearer DA, Tyler CJ, Diss CE, Mian OS, Tillin NA, Bruton AM (2022) The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: two meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 143:104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104911

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Conson M, De Bellis F, Baiano C, Zappullo I, Raimo G, Finelli C, Ruggiero I, Positano M, Trojano L (2020) Sex differences in implicit motor imagery: evidence from the hand laterality task. Acta Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103010

Article  Google Scholar 

Conson M, Volpicella F, De Bellis F, Orefice A, Trojano L (2017) Like the palm of my hands”: motor imagery enhances implicit and explicit visual recognition of one’s own hands. Acta Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.09.006

Article  Google Scholar 

Cross ES, Kraemer DJM, Hamilton AFD, Kelley WM, Grafton ST (2009) Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cereb Cortex 19(2):315–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn083

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Date S, Kurumadani H, Watanabe T, Sunagawa T (2015) Transcranial direct current stimulation can enhance ability in motor imagery tasks. NeuroReport 26(11):613–617

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Waal FB, Preston SD (2017) Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nat Rev Neurosci 18(8):498–509

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Rienzo F, Debarnot U, Daligault S, Saruco E, Delpuech C, Doyon J, Collet C, Guillot A (2016) Online and offline performance gains following motor imagery practice: a comprehensive review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies. Front Hum Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00315

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dum RP, Strick PL (2002) Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate. Physiol Behav 77(4):677–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00929-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Evans C, Zich C, Lee JSA, Ward N, Bestmann S (2022) Inter-individual variability in current direction for common tDCS montages. Neuroimage 260:119501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119501

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB (2014) Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends Neurosci 37(12):742–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47(6):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glover S, Baran M (2017) The motor-cognitive model of motor imagery: evidence from timing errors in simulated reaching and grasping. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perf 43(7):1359

Article  Google Scholar 

Glover S, Bibby E, Tuomi E (2020) Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model. Exp Brain Res 238(4):931–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05756-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Goldberg G (1985) Supplementary motor area structure and function: review and hypotheses. Behav Brain Sci 8(4):567–588. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00045167

Article  Google Scholar 

Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, Knoblich G (2007) Fitts’s law holds for action perception. Psychol Sci 18(2):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01854.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grush R (2004) The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behav Brain Sci 27(3):377–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000093

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guidali G, Arrigoni E, Bolognini N, Pisoni A (2025) M1 large-scale network dynamics support human motor resonance and its plastic reshaping. Neuroimage 308:121082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121082

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guillot A, Rienzo FD, Frank C, Debarnot U, MacIntyre TE (2024) From simulation to motor execution: a review of the impact of dynamic motor imagery on performance. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 17(1):420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.2007539

Article  Google Scholar 

Hardwick RM, Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Swinnen SP (2018) Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 94:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2018.08.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hassanzahraee M, Nitsche MA, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S (2020) Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: an investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms. Brain Stimul 13(3):832–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.027

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hayduk-Costa G, Drummond NM, Carlsen AN (2013) Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action. Behav Brain Res 257:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.030

Article  PubMed