Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):927–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70207-2.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Veronesi U, Viale G, Paganelli G, Zurrida S, Luini A, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2010;251(4):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c0e92a.
Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bartels SAL, Donker M, Poncet C, Sauvé N, Straver ME, van de Velde CJH, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive Sentinel node in breast cancer: 10-Year results of the randomized controlled EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(12):2159–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.01565.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
de Boniface J, Filtenborg Tvedskov T, Rydén L, Szulkin R, Reimer T, Kühn T, et al. Omitting axillary dissection in breast cancer with sentinel-node metastases. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(13):1163–75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313487.
Isik A, Soran A, Grasi A, Barry N, Sezgin E. Lymphedema after sentinel lymph node biopsy: who is at risk? Lymphat Res Biol. 2022;20(2):160–3. https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2020.0093.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Temple LK, Baron R, Cody HS 3rd, Fey JV, Thaler HT, Borgen PI, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(7):654–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02574481.
Rudenstam CM, Zahrieh D, Forbes JF, Crivellari D, Holmberg SB, Rey P, et al. Randomized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in older patients with breast cancer: first results of international breast cancer study group trial 10–93. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):337–44. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.01.5784.
Martelli G, Miceli R, Daidone MG, Vetrella G, Cerrotta AM, Piromalli D, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in elderly patients with breast cancer and no palpable axillary nodes: results after 15 years of follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1217-7.
Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, Cirrincione CT, Berry DA, McCormick B, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(19):2382–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.45.2615.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Society of Surgical Oncology. SSO: Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question.: https://www.surgonc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/SSO-5things-List_2020-Updates-11-2020.pdf (2020). Accessed 11/10/2024.
Sun J, Mathias BJ, Sun W, Fulp WJ, Zhou JM, Laronga C, et al. Is it wise to omit sentinel node biopsy in elderly patients with breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):320–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08759-1.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thompson J, Le J, Hop A, Melnik M, Paulson J, Wright GP. Impact of choosing wisely recommendations on Sentinel lymph node biopsy and postoperative radiation rates in women over age 70 years with Hormone-Positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(10):5716–22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10460-w.
Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJ, Cameron DA, Dixon JM. Breast-conserving surgery with or without irradiation in women aged 65 years or older with early breast cancer (PRIME II): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(3):266–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71221-5.
Gentilini OD, Botteri E, Sangalli C, Galimberti V, Porpiglia M, Agresti R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs no axillary surgery in patients with small breast cancer and negative results on ultrasonography of axillary lymph nodes: the SOUND randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(11):1557–64. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3759.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. 21-gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(25):2336–47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108873.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Roozendaal LM, Vane MLG, van Dalen T, van der Hage JA, Strobbe LJA, Boersma LJ, et al. Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08). BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):459. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3443-x.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jung JG, Ahn SH, Lee S, Kim EK, Ryu JM, Park S, et al. No axillary surgical treatment for lymph node-negative patients after ultra-sonography [NAUTILUS]: protocol of a prospective randomized clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09273-1.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Reimer T, Stachs A, Veselinovic K, Kühn T, Heil J, Polata S, et al. Axillary surgery in breast cancer — primary results of the INSEMA trial. N Engl J Med. 2025;392:1051–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2412063.
Fentiman IS. 8. The dilemma of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Int J Clin Pract. 2001;55(10):680–3.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(6):443–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh069.
Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(6):478–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr027.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Silverstein MJ, Rosser RJ, Gierson ED, Waisman JR, Gamagami P, Hoffman RS, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection for intraductal breast carcinoma–is it indicated? Cancer. 1987;59(10):1819–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19870515)59:10%3C1819::aid-cncr2820591023%3E3.0.co;2-v.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chavez de Paz Villanueva C, Bonev V, Senthil M, Solomon N, Reeves ME, Garberoglio CA, et al. Factors associated with underestimation of invasive cancer in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: precautions for active surveillance. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(11):1007–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2181.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davey MG, O’Flaherty C, Cleere EF, Nohilly A, Phelan J, Ronane E, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac022.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
El Hage Chehade H, Headon H, Wazir U, Abtar H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy indicated in patients with a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):171–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.04.019.
Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(13):1365–83. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.1177.
Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, Kothari A, Zechmeister K, Brown D, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG multicentre trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1237–45. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3379-6.
Comments (0)