In-depth characterization of a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedure based on surgical process modeling

Nahas WC, Rodrigues GJ, Rodrigues Gonçalves FA, Sawczyn GV, Barros GG, Cardili L, Guglielmetti GB, Fazoli AJDC, Cordeiro MD, Cassão VDA, Chade DC, Neves De Oliveira LC, Murta CB, Pontes Júnior J, Trindade EM, Bastos DA, Sarkis AS, Mitre AI, Trinh Q-D, Coelho RF (2024) Perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 212:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003967

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Allan C, Ilic D (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int 96:373–378. https://doi.org/10.1159/000435861

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arenas-Gallo C, Shoag JE, Hu JC (2021) Optimizing surgical techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 48:1–9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Nickel F, Wekerle AL, Preukschas A, Apitz M, Schulte T, Rempel R, Mietkowski P, Wagner F, Termer A, Müller-Stich BP (2015) Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:273–281

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu S, Hemal A (2020) Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why. Transl Androl Urol 9:906–918

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Myers RP, Rocco B, Villers A (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Checcucci E, Porpiglia F (2021) The future of robotic radical prostatectomy driven by artificial intelligence. Mini Invasive Surg 5(49):2574. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.98

Article  Google Scholar 

Yong DZ, Tsivian M, Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Mouraviev V, Albala DM (2011) Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 107:280–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09511.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simon RM, Howard LE, Moreira DM, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ (2017) Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 24:618–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13393

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haapiainen H, Murtola TJ, Raitanen M (2021) 3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon learning curve in the first 200 cases with oncologic and functional results. Scand J Urol 55:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2021.1898465

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andras I, Crisan N, Gavrilita M, Coman RT, Nvberer V, Coman I (2017) Every setback is a setup for a comeback: 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after robotic radical prostatectomy. J BUON 22:87–93

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maier-Hein L, Vedula SS, Speidel S, Navab N, Kikinis R, Park A, Eisenmann M, Feussner H, Forestier G, Giannarou S, Hashizume M, Katic D, Kenngott H, Kranzfelder M, Malpani A, März K, Neumuth T, Padoy N, Pugh C, Schoch N, Stoyanov D, Taylor R, Wagner M, Hager GD, Jannin P (2017) Surgical data science for next-generation interventions. Nat Biomed Eng 1:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0132-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meeuwsen FC, van Luyn F, Blikkendaal MD, Jansen FW, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2019) Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 33:1426–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6417-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Junger D, Frommer SM, Burgert O (2022) State-of-the-art of situation recognition systems for intraoperative procedures. Med Biol Eng Comput 60:921–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02520-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Neumuth T (2017) Surgical process modeling. Innov Surg Sci 2:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0005

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carrillo F, Esfandiari H, Müller S, von Atzigen M, Massalimova A, Suter D, Laux CJ, Spirig JM, Farshad M, Fürnstahl P (2022) Surgical process modeling for open spinal surgeries. Front Surg 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.776945

Article  Google Scholar 

Katic D, Wekerle A-L, Gärtner F, Kenngott HG, Müller-Stich BP, Dillmann R, Speidel S (2014) Model-based formalization of medical knowledge for context-aware assistance in laparoscopic surgery. Medical imaging 2014: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling 9036 903603. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2042240

Neumuth T, Liebmann P, Wiedemann P, Meixensberger J (2012) Surgical workflow management schemata for cataract procedures process model-based design and validation of workflow schemata. Methods Inf Med 51:371–382. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME11-01-0093

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, Feussner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2012) Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal 16:632–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.10.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang B, Ghanem A, Simes A, Choi H, Yoo A (2021) Surgical workflow recognition with 3DCNN for sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 16:2029–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02473-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Franke S, Meixensberger J, Neumuth T (2015) Multi-perspective workflow modeling for online surgical situation models. J Biomed Inform 54:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakawala H, Momi E De, Pescatori LE, Morelli A, Ferrigno G (2017) Inductive learning of the surgical workflow model THROUGH VIDEO annotations. Proc IEEE Symp Comput Based Med Syst 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2017.91

Nwoye CI, Alapatt D, Yu T, Vardazaryan A, Xia F, Zhao Z, Xia T, Jia F, Yang Y, Wang H, Yu D, Zheng G, Duan X, Getty N, Sanchez-Matilla R, Robu M, Zhang L, Chen H, Wang J, Wang L, Zhang B, Gerats B, Raviteja S, Sathish R, Tao R, Kondo S, Pang W, Ren H, Abbing JR, Sarhan MH, Bodenstedt S, Bhasker N, Oliveira B, Torres HR, Ling L, Gaida F, Czempiel T, Vilaça JL, Morais P, Fonseca J, Egging RM, Wijma IN, Qian C, Bian G, Li Z, Balasubramanian V, Sheet D, Luengo I, Zhu Y, Ding S, Aschenbrenner JA, van der Kar NE, Xu M, Islam M, Seenivasan L, Jenke A, Stoyanov D, Mutter D, Mascagni P, Seeliger B, Gonzalez C, Padoy N (2023) CholecTriplet2021: a benchmark challenge for surgical action triplet recognition. Med Image Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2023.102803

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kolbinger FR, Leger S, Carstens M, Rinner FM (2022) Artificial Intelligence for context-aware surgical guidance in complex robot-assisted oncological procedures : an exploratory feasibility study. Eur J Surg Oncol 1(25):106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106996

Article  Google Scholar 

Gholinejad M, Pelanis E, Aghayan D, Fretland ÅA, Edwin B, Terkivatan T, Elle OJ, Loeve AJ, Dankelman J (2022) Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods. Sci Rep 12(1):16684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19891-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Neumann J, Neumuth T (2015) Standardized semantic workflow modeling in the surgical domain: proof-of-concept analysis and evaluation for a neurosurgical use-case. In: 2015 IEEE 17th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services (Healthcom): 1st International Workshop on IOR. IEEE

Doryab A, Bardram JE (2011) Designing activity-aware recommender systems for operating rooms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1961634.1961643

Battaglia E, Boehm J, Zheng Y, Jamieson AR, Gahan J, Majewicz Fey A (2021) Rethinking autonomous surgery: focusing on enhancement over autonomy. Eur Urol Focus 7:696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.009

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pinheiro A, Santos PB, Lima E (2022) The CUF technique: extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Springer, Cham

Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Cheng X, Xiong Q, Cheng S (2023) The progress of dorsal vascular complex control strategy in radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231152091

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gholinejad M, J. Loeve A, Dankelman J (2019) Surgical process modelling strategies: which method to choose for determining workflow? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 28:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1591457

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodriguez MF, Rodrigues N, Morais P, Oliveira B, R. Buschle L, Correia Pinto J, Lima E, L. Vilaça J (2022) Feasibility study on automatic surgical phase identification based on speech recognition for laparoscopic prostatectomy. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 4411–4414. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9870990

Katić D, Schuck J, Wekerle AL, Kenngott H, Müller-Stich BP, Dillmann R, Speidel S (2016) Bridging the gap between formal and experience-based knowledge for context-aware laparoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1379-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif