Endotracheal suctioning: moving from standard to individualised procedure in mechanically ventilated patients – Response to Ji and Zhang

ElsevierVolume 93, April 2026, 104285Intensive and Critical Care NursingAuthor links open overlay panelAlberto Lucchini, Marco Giani, Emanuele RezoagliShow moreAccess through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organizationSection snippetsCRediT authorship contribution statement

Alberto Lucchini: Visualization, Writing – original draft. Marco Giani: Writing – review & edi, ting. Emanuele Rezoagli: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

None.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

None.

Ethical statement

Impact of catheter size and endotracheal tube diameter on PEEP stability during closed suctioning in a simulated ARDS patient: a bench top study. As the research was conducted at a bench-top level, ethical approval from the local committee was not required because of its in-vitro nature.

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

View full text

© 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Comments (0)

No login
gif