This study investigated the wellbeing of UK police officers transitioning out of service, examining retirees, early leavers, and those within 12 months of retirement (N = 370). Using the Job Demands–Resources model, the research identifies a ‘wellbeing paradox’: leavers demonstrate high resilience and subjective wellbeing alongside significantly elevated psychological distress compared to general population norms. Findings reveal that recently retired (≤5 years) and soon-to-retire groups are particularly vulnerable, reporting lower quality of life and higher distress than long-term retirees. Perceived organisational support and resilience emerged as critical buffers against the psychological burden of a policing career. However, participants identified significant unmet needs for career, financial, and mental health guidance during the transition. The study highlights that the anticipatory retirement period is an acute window of vulnerability, suggesting that proactive, targeted organisational interventions are essential to mitigate the lasting psychological burden of policing and ensure successful civilian transitions.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval was granted by the Humanities, Social, and Health Sciences Research Ethics Panel at the University of Bradford (Reference Number E1350). All participants provided written informed consent.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors