Referencias Bibliográficas

1. Basirat Z, Adib Rad H, Esmailzadeh S, Jorsaraei SGA, Hajian- Ti-laki K, Pasha H, et al. Comparison of pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers following ICSI treatment. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(1):39-46. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837924/pdf/ijrb-14-039.pdf [ Links ]

2. Molgora S, Fenaroli V, Acquati C, De Donno A, Baldini MP, Saita E. Examining the Role of Dyadic Coping on the Marital Adjustment of Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Front Psychol. 2019;10:415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00415 [ Links ]

3. Simon L, Shamsi MB, Carrell DT. Sperm Selection Techniques and their Relevance to ART. In: Schatten H, editor. Human Reproduction [Internet]. 1st ed. Wiley; 2017 [cited 2024 Mar 15]. p. 1-43. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118849613.ch1 [ Links ]

4. Choi HW, Park YS, Lee SH, Lim CK, Seo JT, Yang KM. Effects of maternal age on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes using testicular sperm with intracytoplasmic sperm injec-tion. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43(4):221. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2016.43.4.221 [ Links ]

5. Bosch E, De Vos M, Humaidan P. The Future of Cryopreserva-tion in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Frontiers Endocri-nol. 2020;11:67. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00067 [ Links ]

6. Coutifaris C. Freeze-only in vitro fertilization cycles for all? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.028 [ Links ]

7. Tavukcuoglu S, Al-Azawi T, Khaki AA, Al-Hasani S. Is vitrification standard method of cryopreservation. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012;17(3):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2012.07.007 [ Links ]

8. Chen H, Zhang L, Meng L, Liang L, Zhang C. Advantages of vitrification preservation in assisted reproduction and potential influences on imprinted genes. Clin Epigenet. 2022;14(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01355-y [ Links ]

9. Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038 [ Links ]

10. Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomás C, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Re-prod. 2009 Jul 1;24(7):1632-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep042 [ Links ]

11. Zhu D, Zhang J, Cao S, Zhang J, Heng BC, Huang M, et al. Vitri-fied-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles-time for a new embryo transfer strategy? Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1691-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.022 [ Links ]

12. Belva F, Henriet S, Van Den Abbeel E, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Der Elst J, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008 Jul 8;23(10):2227-38. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den254 [ Links ]

13. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Solà I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-anal-ysis. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2012.09.003 [ Links ]

14. Alviggi C, Conforti A, Carbone IF, Borrelli R, De Placido G, Guer-riero S. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstet & Gyne. 2018;51(1):54-63. doi: 10.1002/uog.18942 [ Links ]

15. Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Azevedo MDC, Iaconelli A, Lo Turco EG, et al. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program. Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep;106(3):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.004 [ Links ]

16. Gullo G, Giuseppe B, Cucinella G, Greco M, Perino A, Chiantera V, et al. Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproduc-tive techniques: a single center retrospective cohort study and ethical-legal implications. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023; 27(14):6809-6823. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202307_33152 [ Links ]

17. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts: Curr Op Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jun;11(3):307-11. doi: 10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013 [ Links ]

18. Arav A. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. Theriog-enology. 2014;81(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenolo-gy.2013.09.011 [ Links ]

19. Casciani V, Monseur B, Cimadomo D, Alvero R, Rienzi L. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in assisted reproductive tech-nology: past achievements and current challenges. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(3):506-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.06.005 [ Links ]

20. Estudillo E, Jiménez A, Bustamante-Nieves PE, Palacios-Reyes C, Velasco I, López-Ornelas A. Cryopreservation of Gametes and Embryos and Their Molecular Changes. Intern J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10864. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910864 [ Links ]

21. Konc J, Kanyó K, Kriston R, Somoskoi B, Cseh S. Cryopres-ervation of Embryos and Oocytes in Human Assisted Re-production. BioMed Res Internat. 2014;2014:e307268. doi: 10.1155/2014/307268 [ Links ]

22. The Practice Committee of the American Society for Repro-ductive Medicine. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(1):36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024 [ Links ]

23. Weiss MS, Luo C, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Kissin DM, Satten GA, et al. Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer: new approach to minimize the limitations of using national surveillance data for clinical research. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(2):186-94. doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2022.10.021 [ Links ]

24. Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, Van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduc-tion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021(2). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3 [ Links ]

25. Venetis CA. Pro: Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer. Is frozen embryo transfer the future? Hum Reprod. 2022 Jun 30;37(7):1379-87. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac126 [ Links ]

26. Sik A, Oral S, Aba YA, Ozolcay O, Koc M, Sismanoglu A. Preg-nancy results after fresh embryo transfer and selective fro-zen-thawed embryo transfer: Single-center experience. J Gy-necol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(4): 101707. doi: 10.1016/j. jogoh.2020.101707 [ Links ]

27. Wang SF, Seifer DB. Age-related increase in live-birth rates of first frozen thaw embryo versus first fresh transfer in initial assisted reproductive technology cycles without PGT. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Apr 13;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01210-0 [ Links ]

28. Pinborg A, Henningsen AA, Loft A, Malchau SS, Forman J, Andersen AN. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique? Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):618-27. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det440 [ Links ]

29. Sha T, Yin X, Cheng W, Massey IY. Pregnancy-related compli-cations and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a me-ta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(2):330-342.e9. doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2017.10.019 [ Links ]

30. Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and em-bryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):536-54. doi: 10.1093/ humupd/dms016 [ Links ]

31. Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2014.05.027 [ Links ]

32. Choi HW, Jang H. Application of Nanoparticles and Mela-tonin for Cryopreservation of Gametes and Embryos. CIMB. 2022;44(9):4028-44. doi: 10.3390/cimb44090276 [ Links ]

33. Adebayo FO, Ameh N, Adesiyun AG, Ekele BA, Wada I. Cor-relation of female age with outcome of IVF in a low-resource setting. Intern J Gynecol Obstet. 2023;161(1):283-8. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14545 [ Links ]

34. Vitagliano A, Paffoni A, Viganò P. Does maternal age affect assisted reproduction technology success rates after euploid embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023 Aug 1;120(2):251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertn-stert.2023.02.036 [ Links ]

35. Bagheri RB, Bazrafkan M, Sabour A, Ataei M, Badehnoosh B, Mashak B, et al. The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cross- sectional study. IJRM [Internet]. 2023 Aug 19 [cited 2024 Feb 19]; https://kne-publishing.com/index.php/ijrm/article/view/13891 [ Links ]

36. Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Fabozzi G, Venturella R, Maggiulli R, et al. Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:94. doi: 10.3389/fen-do.2019.00094 [ Links ]